Judgment Day - March 25, 2016 A.D.

a reply to: Edward Palamar

I read your posts. There's a function that allows me to do that.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

the only true brotherhood is ones peers...

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
My degree is in Social Work and clinical counseling - with a specialty in Children and Families.

I'll pray for them.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
Keep that in mind. I'm around.

Oh, big tough guy.

there is nothing at all wrong with individualism

imeo....

originally posted by: Edward Palamar

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
My degree is in Social Work and clinical counseling - with a specialty in Children and Families.

I'll pray for them.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
Keep that in mind. I'm around.

Oh, big tough guy.

What is the reason for your hostility please?

Even when members offer to talk and discuss you insult them with short attacks, it does not seem fluid with your other posts?

a reply to: nonspecific

Yeah I don't think john the baptist would behave like this...

a reply to: AinElohim

Indeed. What I'm wondering about is the timeline -

But while in term for this third time, September 25, 1955 A.D. to June 25, 1956 A.D., a crime was committed by the first king of Persia (Daniel 11:2, the same as Daniel 11:20) against me,

And, now (it appears) he is 58, which adds up. (I'm 56 and was born in 1958) So - immediately reborn?
I don't understand.

I do believe in reincarnation, but this is just very strange. Interesting. And strange.

I wonder how vivid his memories, and for how long he has known this history of his.
I wish I remembered my last incarnation, but I don't.

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: nonspecific

Yeah I don't think john the baptist would behave like this...

He's not John the baptist, he's a very naughty boy.

a reply to: Edward Palamar

Oh, big tough guy.

No - small, aging woman.

sure he would have

JTB was an eccentric and wise to the core....

originally posted by: boymonkey74
Ring these numbers please and just talk.

And I suppose you're going to pay for my minutes, too, meine kleine filthy, thief.

a reply to: AinElohim

Thought i knew you...

a reply to: Edward Palamar

No because I'm in the UK...
I'm sure you can afford a phone call.

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: AinElohim

Thought i knew you...

ahem... you got the wrong guy

me = cosmic.artifact the man who killed your buddy Darwin.

yes... notice my dots?

originally posted by: nonspecific
You have to admit your posts are a little bizzare,

No, I don't have to admit that.

originally posted by: nonspecific
it's only natural that people would be concerned for you.

Even assuming your previous premise, it would only be a possibility.

The count is accurate and is non-assumptive, neither is it offensive nor implicative of a mental and/or social disorder. It is neither rash, nor rude.

originally posted by: nonspecific
Well that seems a little harsh?

Seeming harsh and actually being harsh are two different things.

originally posted by: Edward Palamar

originally posted by: nonspecific
You have to admit your posts are a little bizzare,

No, I don't have to admit that.

originally posted by: nonspecific
it's only natural that people would be concerned for you.

Even assuming your previous premise, it would only be a possibility.

The count is accurate and is non-assumptive, neither is it offensive nor implicative of a mental and/or social disorder. It is neither rash, nor rude.

I simply must disagree, even on a site such as this your posts would be considered bizzare, the fact that you choose to belive otherwise does not change the fact.

Yes it is a possibility but the most likely one given the evidence at hand.

As to the last part of your post I must ask you to explain as I do not understand what it means.

originally posted by: Edward Palamar

originally posted by: nonspecific
Well that seems a little harsh?

Seeming harsh and actually being harsh are two different things.

Ok I will rephrase my statement.

that was a harsh and uncalled for statement.