Their was a website...

That recently got on the news for their ideas about 9/11 and how it was done by the goverment. Was that abovetopsecret

There's a website:

letsroll911.org - it might be the one you're thinking of.

Originally posted by elemtalsage
That recently got on the news for their ideas about 9/11 and how it was done by the goverment. Was that abovetopsecret

i dont think so, it would have been very public on this board if we made the airwaves

It's also the catch phrase which was supposedly what one of the heros said on the flight that crashed in PA...I assume that the victim's family is a little upset over the fact that someone is using that as a url for a conspiracy theory site....

Oh well...such is the public domain...just b/c the guy died saying it in a tragic event doesn't mean he owns it....

I thought I heard something about this site

911research.com...

there are tons of very good websites on the subject
simply do a google search.

In fact there is a very good thread on the subject here at ATS

Bombs in the building 'conspiracy theory' is a conspiracy fact
can be found in the political conspiracy forum

Originally posted by EnronOutrunHomerun
I assume that the victim's family is a little upset over the fact that someone is using that as a url for a conspiracy theory site....

Communities of researchers that are digging through available evidence and getting past the Bush administration's stonewalled enquiries and cover-ups don't view their published material as "conspiracy theory websites".

[edit on 5-7-2005 by MaskedAvatar]

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Communities of researchers that are digging through available eveidence and getting past the Bush administration's stonewalled enquiries and cover-ups don't view their published material as "conspiracy theory websites".

While I wouldn’t hesitate to agree MA, I think that at the time I wrote that statement I was keeping the viewpoint of "the general public" in mind.....

Most people think any challenges to what's pressed directly in their face is instantly a "conspiracy theory" (Defined in a different manner than most here would view that phrase) and thus dubbed as rubbish.....


....Or I could have just been randomly posting while drunk.....


[edit on 7/5/2005 by EnronOutrunHomerun]

We were (incorrectly) quoted in Scientific American recently regarding the 9/11 incident and possible government involvement.

Originally posted by SimonGray
We were (incorrectly) quoted in Scientific American recently regarding the 9/11 incident and possible government involvement.

What wankers, I'd sue if I was you or make them retract the article.

You so know you want to.

[edit on 5/7/2005 by Odium]