It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The issue I have with the "it's their choice" argument is that it's a public health issue.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: jaffo
vaccines take lives.
There is no way humanly possible to know how many people will die tomorrow.
Any intervention is just guess work.
Studies are flawed and bias toward the highest bidder.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
This stuff kills kids. . . . .
But seriously it should be by choice, no one should be forced to get vaccinated.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: jaffo
vaccines take lives.
There is no way humanly possible to know how many people will die tomorrow.
Any intervention is just guess work.
Studies are flawed and bias toward the highest bidder.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
This stuff kills kids. . . . .
But seriously it should be by choice, no one should be forced to get vaccinated.
I find it amazing that people can be so willfully ignorant....
Look into the history of vaccinations, read up on small pox and how many children it killed in the last century, and how many children it kills today.
You are also making this world a worse place to live.
After vaccination campaigns throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, the WHO certified the eradication of smallpox in 1979.[5] Smallpox is one of two infectious diseases to have been eradicated, the other being rinderpest, which was declared eradicated in 2011.[16][17][18]
People who receive flu vaccines year after year can sometimes show reduced protection, an effect that Canadian infectious disease specialists say muddies public health messages for annual flu vaccine campaigns.
During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, researchers at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control originally thought seasonal flu shots from 2008 might offer extra protection against the new pandemic strain. They were puzzled to find instead, seasonal flu vaccination almost doubled the risk of infection with pandemic flu.
Yeppers, it's controversial stuff alright. Fact remains though:
seasonal flu vaccination almost doubled the risk of infection with pandemic flu.
Current- and previous-season vaccination generated similar levels of protection, and vaccine-induced protection was greatest for individuals not vaccinated during the prior 5 years. Additional studies are needed to understand the long-term effects of annual vaccination.
In conclusion, we found that vaccination provided protection against medically attended influenza infection, regardless of prior vaccination history.
originally posted by: GetHyped
originally posted by: xDeadcowx
Nobody can honestly say that all vaccines are 100% safe and effective.
Who actually says this though?
As a mother, I put my parenting decisions above all else. Nobody knows my son better than me, and the choices I make about how to care for him are no one’s business but my own. So, when other people tell me how they think I should be raising my child, I simply can’t tolerate it. Regardless of what anyone else thinks, I fully stand behind my choices as a mom, including my choice not to vaccinate my son, because it is my fundamental right as a parent to decide which eradicated diseases come roaring back.
The decision to cause a full-blown, multi-state pandemic of a virus that was effectively eliminated from the national population generations ago is my choice alone, and regardless of your personal convictions, that right should never be taken away from a child’s parent. Never.
The real problem is that these people tend to stick together. A new study this week finds strong evidence that people who rejected vaccines for their young children are clustered together in the same communities. And that only increases the risk that measles — a highly contagious respiratory disease that was believed to have been eradicated 15 years ago — will spread to more children.
originally posted by: jonnywhite
I do think there's a line in hte sand between letting our immune system do some of the work and using immunizations for hte rest. When one puts the responsibility on the immune system too far, the natural defenses are overwhelmed, while in the reverse circumstance it might lead to severe dependency on pharmaceuticals.
Where do seasonal vaccinations sit on this tug-o-war?
I do know if there was a dangerous flu going around I'd probably want to be immunized. Who wouldn't And that's just a flu...
Zinc -- Your body needs zinc for its immune system to function properly, so it has long been thought that zinc could help protect against catching a cold or flu. But the evidence has been decidedly mixed, with some studies finding a benefit from zinc lozenges and others showing no effect. Recently, a review of studies that compared zinc to placebo found that most of them had flaws that made any positive results unreliable. Only 4 studies were deemed reliable, and 3 found no benefit from zinc lozenges. The remaining positive study suggested that zinc nasal sprays might help reduce nasal stuffiness, but zinc nasal sprays have been reported to cause permanent loss of smell and are not recommended for use. If you do decide to try zinc lozenges for a cold, remember that getting too much zinc (more than 50 mg per day over a long period of time) can be dangerous. People taking cisplatin, penicillamine, and quinolone or tetracycline antibiotics should not take zinc.
Source: Influenza | University of Maryland Medical Center umm.edu...
University of Maryland Medical Center