It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
originally posted by: Shamrock6
1) his parents paint him as just a sweet kid with no issues? how shocking!
Sarcasm noted.
However…
The important question is, would this disenfranchised 20-year old have entertained violent action without the nudging of an FBI operative?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: Puppylove
Sounds more like an undercover sting...
Planning a crime with potential criminals and then swooping in is entrapment.
The hooker situation is like the drug bust examples...
Cop has money, says he'll buy drugs, makes an arrest when the drugs appear... Sting!
Cop sits with a criminal, plans a bank heist, funds it, makes arrest when it starts... Entrapment!
I think*...
Maybe Shamrock will be able to confirm or deny!
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
a reply to: Shamrock6
It's odd that the "Raheel Mahrus Ubaydah" Twitter account was apparently disabled faster than the compromised CentCom account earlier this week.
There's no latent record of the account to be found anywhere online. Typically Google will cache premalinks to Twitter accounts long after the account is disabled. There's none to be found.
originally posted by: amicktd
Pretty sure this is how the narcotics officers work as well. I say good on the FBI for catching this guy before some massacre hits the front pages.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
1) his parents paint him as just a sweet kid with no issues? how shocking!
2) I liked one of the comments in the link: FBI - here's a bunch of money, go buy guns and come up with a plan to kill people
Person talking to FBI - no.
kind of woulda killed that off pretty quick, yea?
originally posted by: Ridhya
a reply to: Puppylove
Entrapment by definition has to involve coercion to do something the target otherwise wouldnt have. Theoretically speaking, if all they did was offer (without pressure), it wouldn't be considered as such.
I gotta agree with Shamrock, if someone offers you drugs or paid sex or a terrorist plot, all you gotta do is refuse
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
There's an interesting new twist to the arrest of Christopher Lee Cornell, who was arrested for plotting an attack at a national landmark, and kill a government official. While initial stories that came out indicate the FBI "was watching" Christopher, recent details actually reveal it was an FBI sting operation.
Dad Accuses FBI of Setting Up 'Mommy's Boy' Son in Bomb Plot
The FBI first noticed Cornell several months ago, after an informant notified the agency that Cornell was allegedly voicing support for violent “jihad” on Twitter accounts under the alias, “Raheel Mahrus Ubaydah,” according to charging documents. In addition, Cornell allegedly posted statements, videos and other content expressing support for ISIS – the terrorist group also known as ISIL – that is wreaking havoc in Iraq and Syria.
John Cornell, Sr., Christopher's father, said his son could never come up with a terror plot of his own, and that the FBI is responsible for putting thoughts of violence in his head over the course of at least two secret meetings with an informant in Cincinnati. Each meeting lasted at least two days, on the last meeting, the plot to launch an attach in Washington, DC was hatched.
Christopher apparently bought nearly $2,000 worth of weaponry: two semi-automatic rifles and 600 rounds of ammunition (in addition to pipe bomb materials). However, Christopher's father said his son didn't more than $1,200 in his bank account -- the money had to have come from the FBI
So, it appears that based on the disenfranchised tweets of a 20-year old suburban young man; the FBI can swoop in under the guise of a like-minded militant, nudge that person toward violent intent, supply that person with the tools for violence, and then claim victory when an arrest is made and terror plot foiled.
Pathetic.
How many of us here have expressed angry discontent over the operations of our government and law enforcement? How many of us have taken to social media to further rage our long running grievances? What would it take for over-zealous federal agents, anxious to demonstrate their worth, to classify some of us as sympathizers to enemies of the state?
Dangerous times my friends… dangerous times.