posted on Jun, 3 2003 @ 02:11 PM
Well, they may very well have lived. Just like some animals were here, then died off. Giant Sloth, Saber Tooth Tiger, Smilidon, Wooly Mammoth. All
those existed, yet none alive today. Of course, we have found fossils and frozen bodie of those.
Ok, so what about the "living fossil" fish whatever it's called? No one thought they were alive, then hey, caught one.
Of course, people knew they had existed due to fossils. The fact that none have been found of a unicorn is something one needs to think about. Maybe
they were all hunted? All hunted and killed, the way their bodies were disposed of meant none were in right situation to fossilize. And ones that
weren't hunted and killed were found by people, stripped of the horn and meat and so forth, and again taken out of a way to fossilize.
Some would say well, at least one would make it to fossilization. Yes, one would. But then an earthquake happens and it is destroyed, a flood,
volcano, so forth. Out of the billions of dinosaurs that lived, only a few fossils are found. So if only a couple million unicorns lived and were
wiped out by over hunting, and only several thousand made it into a situation to fossilize, then actually are still together today, who knows where
the fossil is? Could be in a mountain, under a building, under a road, under a jungle, so forth.
But to me, they never existed. But always fun to try and explain things. Like the Narwal. That was used to say unicorns existed. Why/how? Every
land animal has a sea animal was a theory used in old days. So if the Narwal existed in the sea, what was it's land counter part?????