TV Meteorologist shot. Chemtrail Believers Applaud it

originally posted by: MysterX

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: MysterX

Yes, but you cannot rule out the possibility that it was the work of a psychotic chemmie. In any event, the chemmies seem to think it was justifiable homicide.

TWO cold, idiotic bozos who happen to be chemmies do at any rate...hardly 'The chemmies' is it.

Go and look at FB chemtrail pages, go and read through some of the CT debates on here.

You'll find as I have that the sentiments expressed by the two individuals in the OP are quite common. I've read and heard people talking about taking 'action' many times. And especially on FB I've seen belligerent and threatening language used by chemtrail believers directed at people who challenge their paradigm.

So no, it's is absolutely no surprise to me to see comments like these ones in the OP.

Oh yeah, and your contention that these comments were put there to make CT believers look bad is so typically 'chemtarded' I had to laugh. The legions of 'shills' online don't miss a thing don't they?

a reply to: MikeHawke

I got a question for you. what did they use to make clouds seed? if the answer is any kind of chemical then your retarded.

Well here you go...

a reply to: AutumnWitch657

While it makes me a little uneasy too, I'm happy to accept the explanation given is a genuine one, having witnessed how this site has grown and been managed over the last ten years. There is a plan and a purpose behind ATS' move (though, I confess, I won't be donating as I don't believe in the principle of donating to websites full stop, though that's another debate)

The other place has been raking in money for over a decade with no tangible aims or targets and no achievements to point to (I wonder what sort of house and car the owner has though).

a reply to: MikeHawke

They 'seed clouds' not make "clouds seed", were talking about the weather here not your home-grow operation.

a reply to: jaws1975

No worries, I wish all debates could be so civil. While I don't wish to HAARP on about an earlier observation you made (see what I did there), you may have noted that it was a believer in chemtrails who joined the thread and called all sceptics 'retarded' recently. Cuts both ways unfortunately.

a reply to: waynos

good call. it was the guy above you. I apologize. A. I Dont like the new layout. I used to like it when the avatars were on the side. And B I was driving in this bull# Christmas traffic. everything I said to you about grammar pretend I said it to aroaki. Then divi out the chemtrail argument to you. Now that I'm home let me hop on the computer but I'm also going to be hopping on Grand Theft Auto so.. It might take a minute to gather all my evidence.

a reply to: MikeHawke

Priorities, right?

a reply to: Cambot

GTA is clearly more important that exposing a conspiracy to kill all of mankind..

a reply to: Chadwickus

Clearly.

This entire thread is sad. You took the shooting of a weatherman and turned it into a chemtrail debate. I couldn't help notice that in the op they first started talking about how they turned into a police state and no one mentions it. This happened in a tiny town, in fact I believe the news station is right out of city limits. They put up roadblocks. Told people to stay inside and lock their doors. They took over a house and arrested a man who wasn't involved because he had a previous warrant. The tiny cities on both sides were subjected to needless fear and arrests that wouldn't have happened otherwise. This entire thread looks off topic from the op. I guess we won't be discussing the police-state because it hasn't happened to you yet. Thank god the weatherman is fine.

a reply to: angelmarie

To be fair, while your post is well worth discussion, this is not the place. This is a forum for discussing chemtrails (plus GE related topics generally) and the OP was not so much about the shooting itself as there are other fora for this topic, but more about the fact that the shooting was being celebrated on a chemtrail facebook group, drawing attention to the dangerously delusional level that some people have reach with this subject.

On the topic of the original OP and the responses it drew. While it is unfair to tar all chemtrail believers with the same brush, it is also worth pointing out that the fb group admin haven't condemned the sentiments expressed and haven't removed the post either, so there's no need for anyone to feel they are being portrayed unfairly.

your post was a bit more on point. You are right it was about the comments made. Then turned into a chemtrail debate. I wasn't calling you out or anything it was an accident that I replied to you specifically. What they said was messed up whether chemtrails are real or not.

a reply to: angelmarie

I absolutely agree with that.

a reply to: Cambot

Yea. ATS isnt really up there on the list. it was snowing in GTA last night... snowing... Yea its more important. if you hear my tone of voice that's heavy dry sarcasm.

I never really got around to it at all last night, so I'll be doing with this now. Starting with this Shasta California air quality meeting. best speaker is at 30 minutes in. Also many others. Another funny point is at 25:00. and the chemtrails I'm talking about are the ones that are made to block out the Sun "to reduce global warming " I could really give a # about weather modification but I feel like its important because its a good cover for it all. Or at least the perfect scapegoat. The blame gets thrown everywhere but on the culprit. It's like a shell game.


youtu.be..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">Shasta County Board of Supervisors Hearing on Che…: youtu.be...



Tried fixing the link 5 times. Won't fix. Click the 2nd YouTube link.

Chicken Little has apparently armed himself...

a reply to: MikeHawke

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Once you read this, you can decide if you really want to discuss this again.

a reply to: MikeHawke

Not that old chestnut again. It's funny how provable science is dismissed as lies, debunkers called government shills etc, but any old crackpot can stand up and say "I'm a pilot and chemtrails are real" and their credentials aren't questioned at all, it's good enough to accept as gospel truth because they say what you want to hear. Lol.

Check out this discussion, your link is old hat.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: MikeHawke

Actually, none of anyone's credentials matter. There are stupid pilots, stupid scientists, and stupid posters on ATS. But what we have is actual, factual, understood science that explains why chemtrails are most likely contrails.

Once you can explain why that science is wrong, we can have all sorts of discussions about who may be spraying what. Until then, enjoy playing games and calling everyone who disagrees with you a shill. It's very adult like.

a reply to: MikeHawke

best speaker is at 30 minutes in.

If Mangels is your best, then your best just isn't good enough. Interesting read here.

Feel free to refute the information.

Tried fixing the link 5 times.

Trivia question for you. Who posted the following quote?

stupid people usually just stick to their ways of ignorance.

Ha! Preach it brother! 5 times you tried? LOLOL!

Won't fix.

Bull#! Just for fun, here's your vid that "won't fix".
Wouldn't you prefer to just discuss the topic?