Will Bush decide to attack North Korea or Iran before his term ends?

Sadly people see him as a dictator comparable to Hitler just because he invaded or "liberated" Iraq and Afghanistan Both of the two were flops, Bush said he would capture Osama for Afghanistan,but he didn't do that,Neither did he make Iraq a better place,all he did was create chaos there and lots of shortages. Anyway,back to weaponry,not politics.

Originally posted by zurvan
If I was "a" president! natural resourdes to exploit! I wonder whose side you are on?

But any way I hope you are right, it is time for Islam to go were it belongs, thats right the rubbish bin of history.

I would like to point out that this comment is EXTREAMLY racist and untrue on all accounts... and very unfair to Islams!! Why should Islam be taken down and destroyed? Come on I want a GOOD reason!

Also this is what could very well happen if America is STUPID enough to invade Iran : www.abovetopsecret.com...'

Originally posted by The_Squid

Originally posted by zurvan
If I was "a" president! natural resourdes to exploit! I wonder whose side you are on?

But any way I hope you are right, it is time for Islam to go were it belongs, thats right the rubbish bin of history.

I would like to point out that this comment is EXTREAMLY racist and untrue on all accounts... and very unfair to Islams!! Why should Islam be taken down and destroyed? Come on I want a GOOD reason!

Also this is what could very well happen if America is STUPID enough to invade Iran : www.abovetopsecret.com...'

O.K. I think I need to clarify that I am all for freedom of expression and religion. I should have explained myself better. Islam is not a religion that is designed to be a personal matter. It is hell bent on making everyone follow it. That is exactly were I have problem with Islam. Moslem are told to go out and fight to spread Islam and they are allowed to kill non moslems if they don't submit and acknowledge the Moslim god. I mean ofcourse if/when one day Islam is reformed then it will become a hole different story. At the moment though it is not. They actually have crusaders read Jihadist that are running around killing people!

on top of that : "Look at how they treat woman and on that note I rest my case!

Originally posted by zurvan



O.K. I think I need to clarify that I am all for freedom of expression and religion. I should have explained myself better. Islam is not a religion that is designed to be a personal matter. It is hell bent on making everyone follow it. That is exactly were I have problem with Islam.
Moslem are told to go out and fight to spread Islam and they are allowed to kill non moslems if they don't submit and acknowledge the Moslim god.
[................]

on top of that : "Look at how they treat woman and on that note I rest my case!

well, i see this as both an Artistic and Beautiful expression.

the ObLs, MaZs, will face their own judgements or rewards.....
in fact every soul, in every religion, will face final judgement, so it is said


@73w32n





[edit on 23-12-2004 by St Udio]

Originally posted by zurvan

Originally posted by The_Squid

Originally posted by zurvan
If I was "a" president! natural resourdes to exploit! I wonder whose side you are on?

But any way I hope you are right, it is time for Islam to go were it belongs, thats right the rubbish bin of history.

I would like to point out that this comment is EXTREAMLY racist and untrue on all accounts... and very unfair to Islams!! Why should Islam be taken down and destroyed? Come on I want a GOOD reason!

Also this is what could very well happen if America is STUPID enough to invade Iran : www.abovetopsecret.com...'

O.K. I think I need to clarify that I am all for freedom of expression and religion. I should have explained myself better. Islam is not a religion that is designed to be a personal matter. It is hell bent on making everyone follow it. That is exactly were I have problem with Islam. Moslem are told to go out and fight to spread Islam and they are allowed to kill non moslems if they don't submit and acknowledge the Moslim god. I mean ofcourse if/when one day Islam is reformed then it will become a hole different story. At the moment though it is not. They actually have crusaders read Jihadist that are running around killing people!

on top of that : "Look at how they treat woman and on that note I rest my case!

That's quite ignorant of you to make such claims regarding Islam as if the same does not apply to Christianity. One of the central doctrines of Christianity is to be "hell bent on making everyone follow it." Just because most "Christians" do not follow their own doctrine fully does not mean the religion itself is any less oppressive or violent.

no, Jan. 6 , Kerry legally enters the recount/ vote fraud process in Ohio. He has unconceded. 2005 , Kerry takes over, maybe Jan.31, or in Feb 2005.

Bush's Skull & Bones given name was "temporary",, now it comes into play.

well america right now looks like an injured animal making it clear to all they dont have resources or troops and are in a bad position and streatched realy thin but when u let ur guard down thats when the animal clearly strikes ,

bluff, calm before the storm


why u think iran wants a nuke, political leverage so america cant attack

but id say iran then N.K

[edit on 26-12-2004 by Rugoolian]

Personally I don't think Dubya will be happy until he's ticked off every single nation in the world.

Even though I am not a fan of Bush, I do not think he will be getting the US into anymore wars in his next term. Iraq is a handfull and if they want any change there they are gonna have to stay focused. But then again Bush and Co. has done some pretty stupid crap in the past.

All Bush needs is another big "terrorist attack" on US soil - then he can pretty much do what wants, within reason, tbh.

Originally posted by Curio
All Bush needs is another big "terrorist attack" on US soil - then he can pretty much do what wants, within reason, tbh.

I disagree. If there is another attack on US soil then there will be even more pressure to bring the troops home to protect the homeland. Just a hunch though...

Originally posted by thecry
I remember watching CNN like 8 months ago and one of there pentagon correspondents (Jamie Mcintyre I think) said he was interviewing George W bush about Iraq and Afghanastan and at the end of the interview he asked Bush about what he was going to do about North Korea at which time Jamie Mcintyre said bush gave him this wierd look as to say ,just wait and see what were going to do to them.
So my question is, now that Iran has secretly been trying to develop Nuclear weapons and Noth Korea openly developing nuclear weapons do you think George W Bush will plan to attack Iran or North Korea before the end of his term?
I personal think he will but not until after they recoup from the Iraq war ,like in another 2 years.No flaming, I'm just curious if you guys think he will or not.

Haha, why of course he will! He needs an excuse for a THIRD term . Recall the 2004 elections? Bush constantly stated that Kerry would not make a good leader to continue the War on Terror. I find this laughable since Bush himself never fought a war (versus Kerry who did), and Bush also has no evidence that Kerry's a bad leader. Just watch the warmongering idiot declare a third term because we all know that nobody in the continental United States is as qualifiable to become commander-in-chief as he is, right?

Originally posted by sardion2000

Originally posted by Curio
All Bush needs is another big "terrorist attack" on US soil - then he can pretty much do what wants, within reason, tbh.

I disagree. If there is another attack on US soil then there will be even more pressure to bring the troops home to protect the homeland. Just a hunch though...

That works the other way around, unless you want combat troops on every street corner with XM-8s...

I think we are in enough trouble as it is now and this war is costing too much. Best thing we can and probably will do is take a wait and see stance with Iran and North Korea. When someone nukes a city or gets sold a nuke or whatnot the U.S. will tell the world, SEE!!! And everyone will join together to smother the situation.

I think Syria would be the next target if any. Iran is in a strong position with close ties to many powerful countries and N. Korea may already have nulcear weapons which would make it off limits. Out of the two N. Korea is probably the most likely but only if they are sure it doesn't already have nukes.

Neither Iran nor N Korea will be attacked unless they really step out of line or are cought red handed in some kind of serious business like selling nukes or WMD's or are found to be inleague with someone using them.

Syria is a more likley target, but again, only if it steps out of line or get caught with hand in hellish acts.

This is not just about Bush, he's is mearly inheriting the mess left over from the cold war...these areas were going to become problems at some point anyway.

Originally posted by zurvan

Originally posted by the dustman
if i was a president id go for iran, it has more natural resources to exploit and the armies are already in striking distance... america will attack north korea when china gives them the excuse by invading taiwan..

If I was "a" president! natural resourdes to exploit! I wonder whose side you are on?

But any way I hope you are right, it is time for Islam to go were it belongs, thats right the rubbish bin of history.

If only we could get all you religious zealots into that bin.

One can only dream.

Originally posted by sardion2000
Even though I am not a fan of Bush, I do not think he will be getting the US into anymore wars in his next term. Iraq is a handfull and if they want any change there they are gonna have to stay focused. But then again Bush and Co. has done some pretty stupid crap in the past.

I was gonna say, for a party who can make up spin to get 70 some percent of America to wage war on a country that's just...a country out there...Anything is possible. Expect the worse, hope for the best my friend...it's a long road ahead.