posted on Jun, 2 2003 @ 10:01 AM
In the ever unique logic of the U.S, the solution to the growing frustration among Iraqis towards the coalition is to scrap the idea of free
democratic elections and appoint the leaders themselves.
Yes. That'll work..
This raises so many questions. For a start it's the one thing the U.S was adamant it would not do. Is it a needed reaction to the current political
situation in Iraq? (Unaided by the U.S handling of the volatile political components of Iraq) Or is it a fearful realisation that the government the
Iraqis would vote in would not be to U.S liking?
Or is it deliberate, the plan all along, making Iraq into a puppet state and a reliable exporter of black gold?
I think it's largely option two, the realisation that the clerics hold as much power in Iraq as they do in most Muslim nations, and a free vote would
see the instigation of a hard line Islamic regime. I find it hard to believe that the U.S is a stupid as to not to know this could have well been the
case before the war, which makes the deliberate option not so unlikely...
"Plans to allow a national conference of Iraqi groups to elect an interim administration may be scrapped, a senior US official in the country has
suggested.
Instead, he said, a political council made up of 25 to 30 Iraqis may be appointed following consultation between the US-led coalition authorities and
political and religious groups."
news.bbc.co.uk...