It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The United Nations Committee against Torture has called on US officials to account for their failure to comply with the anti-torture treaty at a hearing on Wednesday, reports The Intercept.
U.S. government documents released through years of litigation and advocacy by the ACLU show that after 9/11, many hundreds of people were abused or tortured by the CIA and Department of Defense, primarily in Afghanistan, Guantánamo, and Iraq, but also in other countries after unlawful rendition. Approximately 200 people died in U.S. custody, including at least a dozen during or shortly after interrogations. The records show that these illegal policies and actions were devised and approved at the highest levels of the Bush administration – but our nation has done little to make amends for the crimes committed, or to hold to account those who orchestrated the torture program.
Kurnez said, “Many victims are as innocent as I was. But they are enduring the torture of Guantanamo for over 12 years because of their nationality, not because of anything they have done. I understand that international human rights laws like the “Convention against Torture” were created so that the people who commit torture are punished. Isn’t that how we can end torture in the world? So why has no US official been held responsible for brutal practices and torture at Guantanamo or other US prisons? I will never get five years of my life back, but for me and others, it is important that the Committee confronts the United States about its actions in Guantanamo and other prisons,” reports The Intercept.
originally posted by: solongandgoodnight
Let's start with this: torture is morally wrong. Ahhhh.....feels good to get that out of the way.
Now it's time for what we folks here in the real world call a reality check.
Do you really think there is any country that does not torture? If you do, you need to be realistic friend.
Now if it makes you feel better to hear a country say, "we don't torture.", then so be it. As for me I'll take the stance that all countries have and will always do it when they think it's necessary.
This is not supporting torture. I think torture is ridiculous, but the world is what it is.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
Yeah I can see various groups in the Mid-east agreeing to this....
Not!
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
originally posted by: solongandgoodnight
Let's start with this: torture is morally wrong. Ahhhh.....feels good to get that out of the way.
Now it's time for what we folks here in the real world call a reality check.
Do you really think there is any country that does not torture? If you do, you need to be realistic friend.
Now if it makes you feel better to hear a country say, "we don't torture.", then so be it. As for me I'll take the stance that all countries have and will always do it when they think it's necessary.
This is not supporting torture. I think torture is ridiculous, but the world is what it is.
Well, every nation starting to stop it's own routine of torturing should be praised, right? You can't go around and say "everyone does it, so we have to do it, too, even if it is so very morally wrong."
The right thing to do would be to say "It is wrong, we stop doing it!".
Defending torture is never a good answer.
originally posted by: rockintitz
a reply to: Blister
America must cease its inhumane treatment of innocent people. Plus, compensation and apologies must be made too. The whole story is just so shocking.
I agree but I'd like to add that even guilty people shouldn't be tortured.