It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I dont know where to begin, this vile disgusting creature wanted to lower the age of consent for child porn images to the child to 10 yrs old.
originally posted by: SecretKnowledge
a reply to: KROandSOTV
Can you put up a link to where we can read about this bit please
I dont know where to begin, this vile disgusting creature wanted to lower the age of consent for child porn images to the child to 10 yrs old.
Thanks in advance
originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
I saw something on tv yesterday where Honey Boo Boos mom got involved with no less than three pedophiles who then preyed on her children. Good choice June. You tub... reply to: KROandSOTV
originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
Agreed. I edited my post to include personal experiences.
Being the mother of boys I was still non the less protective. I'd kill anyone who tried to hurt them and you can take that to the bank! They're grown now but us mothers we never stop worrying do we? reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe
originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
And what about the ones who tell their daughters that they are lying and pick the predator over their own child. Or worse blame the child. a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
What an appalling distorted title for an OP.
Can I suggest people have a damn good read about exactly what was happening at that time. Sure there is an historical link between NCCL and PIE but not the one implied by the title of this OP. People need to remember that in the 70's nobody really knew what PIE wa all about and it was the following years that gives everyone this 20:20 expert vision which some (like the tories behind the story) like to twist as if everyone back then had 20:20 vision. It's a political distortion.
NB I'm not defending "labour" merely outing political distortions.....nasty politics.
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe
Better safe than sorry with this kind of thing right? It's just to big of a gamble not to be. Again... I don't thing you are jaded at all. Just safe.
originally posted by: beansidhe
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe
Better safe than sorry with this kind of thing right? It's just to big of a gamble not to be. Again... I don't thing you are jaded at all. Just safe.
Everytime, I would rather be proven wrong and look like a cynical, neurotic car-crash rather than the 'oops!' hypothesis. Always better to be safe than sorry.
Sorry KROand SOTV, I'm sidelining your thread too, it's an important topic. At best, Harman is spineless. At worst she is colluding in the most inexcusable crime there is.