It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Regulation will be dismissed by the bankers/politicians in their pockets as "unnecessary" or "stifling". when what it does is destroy a fraudulent business model.
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
a reply to: NonsensicalUserName
Buuuuuut...guess who owns the government...
originally posted by: BlubberyConspiracy
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
a reply to: NonsensicalUserName
Buuuuuut...guess who owns the government...
Corporations and powerful private wealth enterprises
originally posted by: SubTruth
a reply to: tinker9917
It is not 8,000 a month take home.......taxes. The average mortgage is 1000 a month a car payment is 300-400. Add in insurance and and electricity and that is 400 a month. Food cost is 400 a month easy.
Money just does not go that far anymore. I believe a true middle class household income is over 100,000 a year.
Yes, If you start looking with the beginning of the recession. The average adjusted wage took a bit of a hit then (the top 20% of earners took a bit of a hit bigger hit than the rest). Of course, a lot of people stopped being wage earners at all but we are talking about average adjusted wages, right?
This is more or less the smoking gun on the state of the US economy. When adjusted to inflation the average person's wages are apparently in a decline,
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Hoosierdaddy71
Who's going to run the machines in ten years when we have an entire generation of untrained unskilled workers hitting the market?
That's about to happen.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: puzzlesphere
So it's no problem that we have massive wealth inequality and continuing massive inflation and loss of purchasing power of the dollar while corporate profits grow to increasingly staggering amounts while they ship jobs overseas and wages not only stagnate but decline due to an over abundance of labor?
Nothing to see here right?