It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: criticalhit
You seem to be confused...
The "National" in National Football League doesn't mean the league is state-run. It is a privately owned and operated institution and, as such, it is within its rights to create, enforce, and even choose to ignore any of its own rules as it see fit. That includes rules that may run contary to some Constitutional rights.
You have a right to turn off your television to avoid being subjected to displays of religiousness in the NFL. That is the extent of your freedom of religion in regards to the league. If the league believed that the majority of its fans were offended by Tebow's praying, and it was hurting their bottom line, I'm pretty confident we'd see the league place a ban on the prayer pose. The plain as day simple fact is we live in a world of majority rules in regards to private businesses and the capitalist marketplace and atheists and agnostics constitute a clear minority. I don't want to bluntly say you don't matter, because your cash is as good as anyone else's, but unless your outrage manifests itself in the form of significant loss of revenue, well... you don't matter.
originally posted by: criticalhit
it isn't "evolution" to be forced to deal with crazy superstitions the rest of us should have a degree of separation from such antics,
"There I was, my right arm held down by Chris Berman, my left arm pinned by Terry Bradshaw, Erin Andrews jamming toothpicks under my eyelids to keep me from blinking... forced to witness Husein Abdullah publically display his belie in and praise to a god."
How is anyone forced when they have an on/off switch on their TV? I believe you mean "I was faced with a difficult personal dilema of either changing the channel and missing the game I am entertained by due to my irreligious wont in life, or continue watching the game and whine about it later."
I'm on the other guys side on this one, it isn't "evolution" to be forced to deal with crazy superstitions the rest of us should have a degree of separation from such antics,
originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Sounds like an inconsistant rule then, no?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: criticalhit
Brian Bosworth... used to line up behind an opposing QB he'd just sacked and pantomime laying down the pipe. I don't recall the refs ever flagging him for that, but I do remember Jumbo Elliott laying him out like he was a dead deer when Boz tried that crap on Phil Simms and the resulting backlash was flags and a fine against Jumbo. Your Tebow sodomy argument fails.
As I said, if offended, the offendee can either grow some degree of thickness to their skin or simply stop watching the game.
originally posted by: falloutsover
a reply to: criticalhit
You do realize that when the separation of church and state was written is was for the sole purpose of stating that the United states as a whole wouldn't recognize one religion but would allow for all people of this nation to worship or not worship in your case whomever or whatever it is they like.
"Separation of church and state" (sometimes "wall of separation between church and state") is a phrase used by Thomas Jeffersonand others expressing an understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The phrase has since been repeatedly used by the Supreme Court of the United States.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..." and Article VI specifies that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
Quoted from
en.m.wikipedia.org...