It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SEATTLE (AP) — Faced with increasing criticism of a proposal that would restrict media filming in wilderness areas, the head of the U.S. Forest Service said late Thursday that the rule is not intended to apply to news-gathering activities.
The rule would apply to commercial filming, like a movie production, but reporters and news organizations would not need to get a permit to shoot video or photographs in the nation's wilderness areas, Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell said in a phone interview Thursday.
"The U.S. Forest Service remains committed to the First Amendment," he said, adding: "It does not infringe in any way on First Amendment rights. It does not apply to news-gathering activities, and that includes any part of news."
Forest Service officials had said earlier in the week that news organizations, except in breaking news situations, would be required to obtain a permit and follow a number of criteria if they wanted to film in designated wilderness areas.
Claim: The U.S. Forest Service is proposing new rules that would require permits for commercial filming and photography in federally designated wilderness areas.
Origins: On 25 September 2014, a new rule proposed by the U.S. Forest Service pertaining to photography and film permits sparked internet outrage. According to circulating posts about the issue, the agency would like to charge fees of up to $1,500 before allowing "commercial filming and photography in federally designated wilderness areas." When the proposal is finalized in November 2014, reporters and other media outlets who do not obtain permits could face fines of up to $1,000. (Tourists and park visitors snapping photographs for personal, non-commercial use would not be affected by the proposed regulations.)
originally posted by: CloudsTasteMetallic
a reply to: spookysully
Forest Service says media doesn't need permit
Pretty sure its mountains out of molehills. Besides, if you're in the good spots, nobody'll be around for miles.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Due to budget cuts, Parks Canada explores charging a fee when wildlife is spotted
www.cbc.ca...
originally posted by: beezzer
If you take a picture of nature, then post it on a website where you make money to show where you went on vacation or to promote an area or just because it was a nice picture, would it be for commercial use than?
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: beezzer
If you take a picture of nature, then post it on a website where you make money to show where you went on vacation or to promote an area or just because it was a nice picture, would it be for commercial use than?
I can see both sides of this...I think they are trying to slice out the average joe taking pics and video or news reporters from the Movie Studio that shows up with 5 trucks, 3 trailers and massive crew to film movie scenes. Hopefully they figure it out.