posted on Sep, 13 2014 @ 11:41 PM
a reply to:
mikefougnie
oh no, I just think that part is funny, the part where he's wrong and lies through his teeth is what discredits him. It's off topic and I would
prefer to discuss what YOUR issues are with 14C dating techniques, but the link for the Wikipedia article is-
en.wikipedia.org... But, Wikipedia is itself quoting The Oxford Companion to Archaeology.
Fagan,
Brian M., and Charlotte Beck, The Oxford Companion to Archeology, entry on the "Dead sea scrolls", Oxford University Press, 1996
For the record, I did specify which scrolls were different, Exodus and Samuel. If you want to get into the specifics of the scrolls and their
variances, I suggest starting a thread specifically on them as it is completely off topic as we are supposed to be discussing the alleged issues with
Carbon dating techniques and why your source is completely full of # so if we could get back to that, that'd be great.