It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Sorry for the short reply but doesn't anyone else find it out that this is even allowed to be done ? Why would City and government officials allow them to have this put up.
Third... WTF are you blabbering on about? This is about getting the truth out of the controlled demolition of building 7, which is blatantly obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together.
The fact that they drove around in a van with a large silk screened image of the twin towers with a plane crashing into it, while the events unfolded, tells me they wanted people to know.
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Sorry for the short reply but doesn't anyone else find it out that this is even allowed to be done ? Why would City and government officials allow them to have this put up.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Fylgje
Good. They should show the dancing Israelis too.
I see you get all your news from the internet.
There are a few threads about lizard people in the White House you might be interested in.
Are you saying the "dancing Israelis" didn't exist? Or that they weren't detained? Or that they didn't say their purpose there was to "document the event"?
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Fylgje
Good. They should show the dancing Israelis too.
I see you get all your news from the internet.
There are a few threads about lizard people in the White House you might be interested in.
You must have missed the audio from the police radio describing the truck.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: nOraKat
The fact that they drove around in a van with a large silk screened image of the twin towers with a plane crashing into it, while the events unfolded, tells me they wanted people to know.
You must have missed the thread showing the exact photo of the van in a for sale add.
There were no images of the twin towers on it.
But then again if it's on the internet it must be true. Right?
How about the pictures showing military loading cruise missiles painted like airliners onto a plane?
I can show you before photo shop and after photo shop.
But I already know which ones you will like.
Unicorns anyone? There's proof on a website somewhere.
Or maybe they weren't lucky.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: CaticusMaximus
Third... WTF are you blabbering on about? This is about getting the truth out of the controlled demolition of building 7, which is blatantly obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together.
So let me get this straight.
WTC 7 was blown up with explosives. Right?
So what would they have done if no planes hit the other 2 buildings?
How would they have explained dropping a building without a cover story?
Or are you saying that men ran into a burning building and wired it for demo in a few short hours?
I guess they were lucky that 2 planes came along at the right time to give them a plausible story.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: CaticusMaximus
Third... WTF are you blabbering on about? This is about getting the truth out of the controlled demolition of building 7, which is blatantly obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together.
So let me get this straight.
WTC 7 was blown up with explosives. Right?
So what would they have done if no planes hit the other 2 buildings?
How would they have explained dropping a building without a cover story?
Or are you saying that men ran into a burning building and wired it for demo in a few short hours?
I guess they were lucky that 2 planes came along at the right time to give them a plausible story.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: CaticusMaximus
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Another failed attempt to sow distrust among the people of their government.
Taken straight out of the communist manifesto playbook.
Putin couldn't have trained them any better when he was head of KGB.
"Another failed attempt", "communist manifesto", "Putin", "KGB"... WTF are you blabbering on about?
First off, this is a present and future event, not a past event, so speaking of it in the past tense is bizarre.
Second, communism, Putin, and the KGB have nothing to do with anything here whatsoever.
Third... WTF are you blabbering on about? This is about getting the truth out of the controlled demolition of building 7, which is blatantly obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together. Building 7 is largely unknown because its the smoking gun of this whole sham and is actively avoided when speaking about 9/11. It was even completely excluded from the official 9/11 report.
Please try and post coherently and on topic, because the topic is very important and should not be watered down with nonsense.
Truther crap = nonsense.
Millions of tons of material came crashing to the ground from two towers of amazing height, ya lets call fake and not even consider what that would do to the stability of footings in nearby structures on land that was reclaimed from swamp when built.
Putting that garbage on a big screen on the anniversary of the disaster is a propaganda event which its only intention is to sow the seeds of doubt in govt, can't get a better definition of communist manifesto doctrine implementation than that.
originally posted by: haven123
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: CaticusMaximus
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Another failed attempt to sow distrust among the people of their government.
Taken straight out of the communist manifesto playbook.
Putin couldn't have trained them any better when he was head of KGB.
"Another failed attempt", "communist manifesto", "Putin", "KGB"... WTF are you blabbering on about?
First off, this is a present and future event, not a past event, so speaking of it in the past tense is bizarre.
Second, communism, Putin, and the KGB have nothing to do with anything here whatsoever.
Third... WTF are you blabbering on about? This is about getting the truth out of the controlled demolition of building 7, which is blatantly obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together. Building 7 is largely unknown because its the smoking gun of this whole sham and is actively avoided when speaking about 9/11. It was even completely excluded from the official 9/11 report.
Please try and post coherently and on topic, because the topic is very important and should not be watered down with nonsense.
Truther crap = nonsense.
Millions of tons of material came crashing to the ground from two towers of amazing height, ya lets call fake and not even consider what that would do to the stability of footings in nearby structures on land that was reclaimed from swamp when built.
Putting that garbage on a big screen on the anniversary of the disaster is a propaganda event which its only intention is to sow the seeds of doubt in govt, can't get a better definition of communist manifesto doctrine implementation than that.
the word on your avatar suits you well
originally posted by: LukeDAP
originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: real_one
Is that a good idea? that may bring out terrible memories for some New Yorkers
Yeah, I thought the exact same thing...
"Hey, remember when a friend of yours died on that horrible day? Here's a huge screen to remind you of that!"