It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
16e.) Illicit Activity: Discussion of illicit activities, specifically the use of mind-altering drugs & substances, engaging in computer hacking, promoting criminal hate, discussing sexual relations with minors, and furtherance of financial schemes and scams are strictly forbidden. You will also not link to sites or online content that contains discussion or advocacy of such material. Any Post mentioning or advocating personal use of illicit mind-altering drugs will result in immediate account termination.
i) Narcotics and illicit mind-altering substances, legal or otherwise: discussing personal use or personal experiences as the result of such substances is not allowed in any form.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Op3nM1nd3d
Not true.
If this were true Michael Phelps and Ryan Locte would not be the great swimmers they are. I have some good intel from someone who went to high school with one of them about their cannabis use.
If cannabis has a feminizing affect on developing males then there is no way they could be the great athletes they are.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Gary Hall Jr. Another gold winning swimmer. That is just one small sport.
That study is more than flawed. It is nothing but propaganda to make young men fear the plant.
originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
Oh please. Enough is enough. Tired of being told what I can do with my body. It's medicinally beneficial to many people and for these wolves to tell us what we can consume is disgraceful.
If it can kill you, cause permanent damage to you and those around you, it's legal.
If it's a medicine with a long use in countless cultures for medicinal and recreational purposes with little side effects....it's illegal.
Prohibition does not work. Enough with locking people up and destroying lives. Enough with these lobbyists, corrupt people who enjoy their medication in peace.
When will the average marijuana user stand up instead of whispering their wishes for legalization. Why aren't more people standing up and protesting about this?
And I have to say people like Cheech & Chong held marijuana legalization back for years. They made it look like a party drug, portrayed users with absolutely no responsibilities and no concern for those around them and themselves. These two among hundreds of others helped skew the public opinion on cannabis instead of showing the public that users are mostly responsible, quiet, safe and rational individuals.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Ignoring scientific studies is exactly what the DEA and FDA continues to do.
The arrest stats tell a disturbing tale.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
Oh please. Enough is enough. Tired of being told what I can do with my body. It's medicinally beneficial to many people and for these wolves to tell us what we can consume is disgraceful.
If it can kill you, cause permanent damage to you and those around you, it's legal.
If it's a medicine with a long use in countless cultures for medicinal and recreational purposes with little side effects....it's illegal.
Prohibition does not work. Enough with locking people up and destroying lives. Enough with these lobbyists, corrupt people who enjoy their medication in peace.
When will the average marijuana user stand up instead of whispering their wishes for legalization. Why aren't more people standing up and protesting about this?
And I have to say people like Cheech & Chong held marijuana legalization back for years. They made it look like a party drug, portrayed users with absolutely no responsibilities and no concern for those around them and themselves. These two among hundreds of others helped skew the public opinion on cannabis instead of showing the public that users are mostly responsible, quiet, safe and rational individuals.
So you are going with, ignore the scientific studies.
Gotcha
Cheech and Chong didn't make their characters up out of thin air, they are over exaggerations of reality. Subtle changes to brain makup you will never get to physically see but Cheech and Chong nailed their characters through observation.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: AllSourceIntel
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: AllSourceIntel
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Nice generalization based on no facts. That almost sounds like a propaganda pitch to me.
Did you read all those big words in the study that is the topic of this thread and come to the conclusion no fact finding was attempted?
Insulting and demeaning someone is a turn-off you know. To you, your profile, and anything you have to say. .
Ooooh this must be a brave member of the majority putting the minority view in their place, I better be careful hey or nobody will like me. Never mind that a study here is showing evidence of brain changes that are detrimental, don't speak of it, allude to it, try to connect the findings to everyday observations. Don't go against the current trend just because some study suggests you should, think of ones reputation instead.
Logic is prevailing.
Please refer to my first post in this thread for a better understanding of my take. I support legalization, but do not support youth use below the age of 18.
..
That position is facetious.
The vast majority begin use before 18, the only reason they would buy after the age of 18 is because they already have a lifestyle that revolves around its use. The exceptions are the pain sufferer who never used and has started off from a medical prescription or a really sheltered youth who goes away to college and finds happiness in all the wrong places, befriending those who partook and got hooked before the age of 18. That pre 18 stuff is powerful mojo, there it is again.
originally posted by: AllSourceIntel
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: AllSourceIntel
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: AllSourceIntel
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Nice generalization based on no facts. That almost sounds like a propaganda pitch to me.
Did you read all those big words in the study that is the topic of this thread and come to the conclusion no fact finding was attempted?
Insulting and demeaning someone is a turn-off you know. To you, your profile, and anything you have to say. .
Ooooh this must be a brave member of the majority putting the minority view in their place, I better be careful hey or nobody will like me. Never mind that a study here is showing evidence of brain changes that are detrimental, don't speak of it, allude to it, try to connect the findings to everyday observations. Don't go against the current trend just because some study suggests you should, think of ones reputation instead.
Logic is prevailing.
Please refer to my first post in this thread for a better understanding of my take. I support legalization, but do not support youth use below the age of 18.
..
That position is facetious.
The vast majority begin use before 18, the only reason they would buy after the age of 18 is because they already have a lifestyle that revolves around its use. The exceptions are the pain sufferer who never used and has started off from a medical prescription or a really sheltered youth who goes away to college and finds happiness in all the wrong places, befriending those who partook and got hooked before the age of 18. That pre 18 stuff is powerful mojo, there it is again.
What is facetious is this argument is applied to Cannabis when alcohol applies to it as well but that is never brought into question from your side, nor its dangers.
ETA: How many adults start drinking before 21, 18 even? Does this mean that prohibition should be brought back?
As far as "the vast majority begin use before 18" I suggest you look into the National Household and Monitoring the Future surveys and back up your claim.
ETA: This thread also isn't geared toward legalization, it was geared toward potential dangers to brain development in youth. There have been side discussions on legality, however, that is the only thing you seem to be discussing aside from insulting everyone that they don't understand the study. Also, I pointed you to my first post in this thread to direct you to my take on the threads focus as you challenged my position on that matter. Yet, you did not address that, you ignored that fact and attempt to direct the conversation to legality.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: TinfoilTP
If you had a valid point, you would not need to resort to the Cheech and Chong reference. That was a comedy skit that dealt with A LOT more than simply cannabis.
Also Cheech Marin is not exactly a pothead and Tommy Chong is in better shape than most men his age.