It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AnteBellum
a reply to: mblahnikluver
Hello stranger, long time no see!
Your one of the last people I spoke to in 2011 before I went rogue, lol.
Insurance is the pits and liability insursnce controls the roost! They did a similar stunt with my daughter's tooth spacer, they wanted an x-ray of the missing tooth before approving it, but the dentist wouldn't pull the tooth before they ok'ed the spacer.
So back and forth it went until they realized a 7 year old with an abcessed tooth is probably a bad thing to leave in her mouth. Meanwhile, I felt it was all just a stall tactic to get me to just pay out of pocket, which if she was in pain and didn't get antibiotics I probably would have had to do.
Hope you feel better, take care Ttys. . . AB
originally posted by: CynConcepts
My husband and I have disagreed over the benefits of insurance. He has always had insurance; I have paid cash at time of service. Last year, he had added me to his insurance for obvious reasons, and I was shocked at the bill we received from a regular check up visit! After the insurance paid their portion, my co-pay was still the amount I would have paid in cash, with the exception of added extra labwork, just to be sure! Never would have done that if I knew the outrageous prices they were going to charge. Naturally, I was greatly disappointed.
My husband Is still happy to pay out for our insurance. His stance is that 'if' we need to be admitted into the hospital...it will all balance out then. Myself, I don't know whether to be angry at the insurance industry or the medical industry for taken advantage of me? Or both?
What about you? Who do you think is taking advantage in your medical situation?
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
So Friday I finally had my pesky gallbladder removed. It was done via laproscopic and I was home the same day.
Well one thing irked me. They made me take a pregnancy test and I have NO tubes!! I can't get pregnant. The whole point of having my tubes removed in May was to not be able to get pregnant again. I had one that was damaged and needed to come out so I just had them take both. I have had to take a few since then and it's just a waste of charges to my insurance and then ME!
I find it ridiculous that the wouldn't do my surgery unless I took the damn test. Sure many will say just take it but that isn't the point. The point is it's a useless procedure and yet they will charge my insurance some stupid amount of money for it. Heck even the nurse thought it was stupid and joked about how insurance companies are with what they will pay for and what they won't.
I jumped through hoops for three months over my gallbladder. I saw multiple doctors and each said the same and each charged me a ridiculous amount to tell me the same thing. I paid a fee for each visit where I waited longer to see the doctor than my time was with the doctor.
I don't know anymore but the insurance world is just whacked! The last time I had insurance was in 2007 and boy things have changed!
When I needed MRIs omg it was insane what I went through to get them. I still need one more yet insurance loves to fight paying for those even though they have been VERY helpful with certain diagnosis.
I know people will say be happy you have it but when you can't afford to use the insurance you pay $500 a month for well it gets depressing and stressful!
They were removed not tied. One was damaged and it had to come out, no other options. So my doctor said since she was going to be in there she could take the other one instead of tying it. I also had a non cancerous tumor removed. So mine wasn't an elective procedure it was done for medical reasons.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
At least they let you tie your tubes. I know so many women fighting that alone.
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
They were removed not tied. One was damaged and it had to come out, no other options. So my doctor said since she was going to be in there she could take the other one instead of tying it. I also had a non cancerous tumor removed. So mine wasn't an elective procedure it was done for medical reasons.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
At least they let you tie your tubes. I know so many women fighting that alone.
I had asked about getting them ties after I had my son and was told I would have to take a counseling class before insurance would pay for it. Things were different once I found out I had to have one removed anyway.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
originally posted by: mblahnikluver
They were removed not tied. One was damaged and it had to come out, no other options. So my doctor said since she was going to be in there she could take the other one instead of tying it. I also had a non cancerous tumor removed. So mine wasn't an elective procedure it was done for medical reasons.
originally posted by: ArchPlayer
At least they let you tie your tubes. I know so many women fighting that alone.
I had asked about getting them ties after I had my son and was told I would have to take a counseling class before insurance would pay for it. Things were different once I found out I had to have one removed anyway.
Tied/Removed I was talking about the same thing. The fact you had to take a counseling class had you not had a medical reason PROVES my point...at least you could get it done. I know women who want no kids or had a kid can't get their tubes clipped, burned, removed the whole bit. I know one who had a preggers in the tube and it ruptured and they STILL didn't remove nor fix the damage. Insurance wouldn't cover it they said.
Crazy all the same.