It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
One thing I can say for Ron Paul: "Why not?"
I know what the vomit from the elephants and donkeys looks like. So why not?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Annee
I may be incredibly dense...but can you explain? I thought HUD was established in the late 60's?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Annee
He might. And I may not argue too much if the problem of land ownership is worked out. Otherwise, then it may be better served in other ways. I would hope his addressing of libertarian ideals starts in places other than domestic welfare. Certainly isn't the low hanging fruit when you look at the pieces of pie that make up the US budget.
But given what we have seen....who would be a better choice?