It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: Greven
Not a liar. Just wrong. I know better than to accept information deposited on ATS, and yet I bit anyway. Isn't the first time I have been wrong and will not be the last.
If you look at the actual post, where I posted the record, you should note my comment "If true"... but I guess that is meaningless and does not suit your needs.
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Or are you just saying that an innocent child was killed by the jackboots?
(snipped slanderous false rap sheet)
Yep...innocent. Child. Yep.
originally posted by: Greven
Now you feign innocence and claim that it was an accident. Disgusting.
If this is true, so much for the "innocent child". This is someone starting college? What college? Felons-R-Us University?
Or are you just saying that an innocent child was killed by the jackboots?
(snipped rap sheet)
Yep...innocent. Child. Yep.
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: Greven
Not a liar. Just wrong. I know better than to accept information deposited on ATS, and yet I bit anyway. Isn't the first time I have been wrong and will not be the last.
If you look at the actual post, where I posted the record, you should note my comment "If true"... but I guess that is meaningless and does not suit your needs.
Except, after that, you went in the other thread and posted this:
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Or are you just saying that an innocent child was killed by the jackboots?
(snipped slanderous false rap sheet)
Yep...innocent. Child. Yep.
Now you feign innocence and claim that it was an accident. Disgusting.
a reply to: bbracken677
How about don't trust a site at first glance that uses the word "negro" to describe people?
Think you can do that?
edit: how about looking up cases on www.courts.mo.gov... can you do that?
a reply to: Greven
So: What did you discover?
That you're a filthy shameless liar.
a reply to: Blackmarketeer
Not really. When I first ran across that I made the statement "If true" in a post here on ATS.
a reply to: Greven
Not a liar. Just wrong. I know better than to accept information deposited on ATS, and yet I bit anyway. Isn't the first time I have been wrong and will not be the last.
If you look at the actual post, where I posted the record, you should note my comment "If true"... but I guess that is meaningless and does not suit your needs.
originally posted by: bbracken677
Except, after that, you went in the other thread and posted this:
(link to post which is shown above also)
originally posted by: bbracken677
Obviously you cannot admit to the error you made.
originally posted by: Greven
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
I also see you congratulated those you agreed with and shamed everyone else in the thread because you ASSUMED they didn't watch the video
So to you I offer only this. Perhaps you should be more introspective and less accusatory before shaming anyone
Perhaps you should read more carefully. Did I list you as having not seen the video? No? There you go then. Read better.
It was quite clear from the video that the cop in question challenged protestors standing around holding signs to essentially 'come at him' - a quite literal attempt to incite a riot.
From an officer of the law.
And yet people in this thread kept saying that it was yelled by a cop at rioters/looters. It was not. Read. Better.
I have made no comments elsewhere in this thread. Yet you throw me on 'a side' with people who 'agree with me.' Rather slanderous, don't you think?