It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amuk
This would be a great way to see which Ideology works the best
Originally posted by Majic
In the long history of Europe, one thing above all else is the most rare: peace.
Finally, after so much bloodshed and suffering, the vision of a new Europe united as brothers instead of divided as warriors seems to be finally within reach.
But could the new European Union prove to be a new empire with its own dark side?
Something had to be done, but is the new European Union the answer, or a new problem of its own?
What do you think about the European Union?
Originally posted by Majic
What do you think about the European Union?
Originally posted by BeingWatchedByThem
Nationalists v. Federalists, meaning: people who feel the EU should have more power, versus those who feel the member states should retain most powers.
Recent statements by UN officials and open proposals within UN documents are so alarming that, if most Americans were aware of the UN's efforts they would demand immediate U.S. withdrawal from the global organization. Consider the following list of recent proposals by the United Nations:
At the June 1998 Rome Summit, the UN openly called for the ability to bring to trial any person in the world before their criminal court. In June of 1999 the UN Development Report 1999. It calls for the imposition of several types of world taxation, a world central bank, and a socialist-style redistribution of wealth. The September 1999 UN Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Small Arms calls for global abolition of the right to keep and bear arms. From September 1999 through the present, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan delivered a series of addresses openly calling for an end to national sovereignty, the creation of world law under a global government, and the unrestricted ability of the UN to intervene in the internal affairs of nations.
These and other recent UN pronouncements have openly advocated the accumulation of all of the powers in the UN that modern governments exercise: Trial and punishment of criminals; raising armies and waging war at will; imposing taxes; redistributing wealth; imposing onerous environmental regulations; and confiscating firearms. Many of those powers are certainly not legitimate functions of government. But legitimate or not, the fact remains that these powers can only be exercised by governments.
web.umr.edu...
The UN is evil.� Fact.
The UN is trumpeted by liberals and socialists as the next best thing to heaven on Earth, to them it is a virteous organisation staffed by those who work tirelessly to ensure freedom and safety across the globe.
Nice theory.� The UN is filled to the brim with representatives of some of the most oppressive, un-democratic, anti-freedom regimes imaginable.� That we should look to this vipers nest for guidance and rule making should be laughable, but it is not.� To the liberals and socialists this is a defacto world government.� This to them is A Good Thing.
www.gunculture.net...
Originally posted by Ambient Sound
I believe that many, if not most of the individual countries within the EU will be too busy trying not to become Islamic states in the next 20 years to get very much else done unless you get it done fairly soon. I think you guys have about 5 to 10 years before it becomes irreversable,