150 Mummies of Ancient Unknown Civilisation Discovered in Atacama Desert

a reply to: JamesTB

I think the only way to get the idea across is have 3 skulls in plain photos.

1: a normal human skull

2: a human skull that has binding on it and been made elongated

3: a skull from one of the sites that is naturally elongated.

originally posted by: GallopingFish
a reply to: JamesTB

I think the only way to get the idea across is have 3 skulls in plain photos.

1: a normal human skull

2: a human skull that has binding on it and been made elongated

3: a skull from one of the sites that is naturally elongated.

The third skull in your list above doesn't exist, so no comparison is possible.

Let's all stop and realize that skeletons come with skulls. These are humans. Their skeletons are human, they are human.

Harte

originally posted by: GallopingFish
a reply to: JamesTB

I think the only way to get the idea across is have 3 skulls in plain photos.

1: a normal human skull

2: a human skull that has binding on it and been made elongated

3: a skull from one of the sites that is naturally elongated.

I'm pretty sure I can pull up a screen shot of that from a video I'll have a look

originally posted by: GallopingFish
a reply to: JamesTB

I think the only way to get the idea across is have 3 skulls in plain photos.

1: a normal human skull

2: a human skull that has binding on it and been made elongated

3: a skull from one of the sites that is naturally elongated.

Here you go -

s21.postimg.org...

From the left - artificially elongated, normal, naturally elongated.

originally posted by: JamesTB


Here you go -

s21.postimg.org...

From the left - artificially elongated, normal, naturally elongated.

corrected the above for you

Artificially elongated, normal, artificially elongated

Until you have genetic studies that confirm your idea you are just making the common mistake of saying, " I think and believe this LOOKS natural' while the evidence points to cultural modification.

That means testing (again) the material by reputable laboratories using blind samples

ie, three molars from a Paracas skull, known ancient HSS and modern Peruvian

With the results released to the media and thru scientific reporting media and not certain biased individuals

When might we see such a study James? Until that is done this discussion is the equivalent to arguing how many angels and dance on the head of pin.

A look at BF's declaration concerning the skulls