It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Bush administration plans to reduce by more than 80 percent the miles of rivers and streams it designates as critical to the recovery of troubled Northwest runs of salmon and steelhead, and plans to cut such habitat protections at the region's military bases.
I bet this would hit the point well... after seeing real big forests you don't know should you laugh or cry when thinking about parks and those in cities which are thought as nature in there.
Originally posted by Kidfinger
Anyway, once you goet out of the city, you experience some of the most beautiful forest and woodland areas you're likely to ever see.
Yesterday's action came in response to a series of court decisions that said the federal government must consider the economic cost of designating critical habitat.
"By incorporating more accurate data, we found the area actually occupied by salmon [and steelhead] was one-fifth as large as in the 2000 designations," Lohn said, saying the new area covered about 27,000 miles of streams.
Originally posted by Kidfinger
Skadi,
I have never been to Washington state, but I have been to the portland Oregon Rose festival. Navy sent me Anyway, once you goet out of the city, you experience some of the most beautiful forest and woodland areas you're likely to ever see. If Washington is anywhere close to the natural beauty I witnessed in Oregon, then I would say you have evry reason to do everything possible to protect what Washington Citizens truly care about. Thier surroundings. You should start writing to members of Washington's State Government.
See patriot act, Iraq war, enron, 9/11, environmental record, amongst other reasons, to see why I hate this man.