It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: blupblup
a reply to: samsamm9
It's not exactly new news though it is?
I thought this was just common knowledge?
That's why the far right always rises up, racism, xenophobia...people need to blame the other and need someone to blame for their situation.
originally posted by: ScientiaFortisDefendit
a reply to: samsamm9
When you say more "racism", do you mean more racism toward blacks and hispanics, or do you include the racism toward whites as well?
Remember kids, racism is racism. Reverse racism is "msicar" and that is just hogwash.
originally posted by: WhiteAlice
It's been discussed but I don't think that it's ever been fully proven. I think the most classic example of racism amidst economic downturns is the case of the Mexican Repatriation that occurred in 1929 to 1933.
Another reason the Nazis were so attractive to the German people was the extreme economic hardships after WWI. The hyper-inflation of 1923 reached such ethereal heights that housewives used the valueless German currency to kindle fires.3 Such was the condition under which the Weimar Republic had its beginnings, making the Social Democrats, who were in majority at that time, easy prey for Hitler’s party in future years. With each uphill swing of the economy, growth in Nazi membership stagnated. As the economy began a downslide, Nazi enrollment swelled. The Nazi’s electoral breakthrough in 1932 owed much to the 1929 depression whose virus spread throughout Europe.
originally posted by: blupblup
a reply to: WhiteAlice
So this actually is the first study into the rise of racism, xenophobia and other prejudices during economic troubles?
I'm shocked if that's the case and utterly baffled.
But cool, fair enough.
“It is well known that socioeconomic disparities between White Americans and racial minorities expand dramatically under conditions of economic scarcity,” says David Amodio, the study’s senior author and an associate professor in NYU’s Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science. “Our findings indicate that scarcity changes the way that the people visually perceive another person’s race, and that this perceptual distortion can contribute to disparities.”
“The study’s findings point to a new challenge to discrimination reduction since perceptual effects appear to operate without a person’s awareness,” adds co-author Amy Krosch, a doctoral candidate in NYU’s Department of Psychology. “People typically assume that what they see is an accurate representation of the world, so if their initial perceptions of race are actually distorted by economic factors, people may not even realize the potential for bias.”