It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
even if you could remove all matter from it, space would still be full of all kinds of frequencies we refer to as quantum fluctuations. and you cant get rid of THAT by any means.
if youd compare the energy contained in a certain volume of "theoretically" empty space, and a solid block of a material of your choice the same size, the space would have a crapload magnitutes more energy than a lossfree conversion of said block of matter(excluding the ammount of energy provided by the QF allso present in that volume) into energy.
originally posted by: KrzYma
sure, but not before Big Bang
and how do you know that? math again, right? calculus in a theory...
originally posted by: ErosA433
Vacuum creation of particles in free space followed by annihilation has never been observed.
Firstly the best vacuum created on Earth is something like 10^-12 mbar... at Room temperature this works out at about 10^10 particles per cubic meter.
This is not exactly vacuum, and besides, in order to measure the location of said particle when it is created you require there to be some detector material. Thus such an experiment would not be in vacuum at all.
originally posted by: KrzYma
I deny uncertainty because of why it was invented
EM wave is not a particle, it has length and direction
Making a point photon of it takes those properties away and uncertainty is created.
You however need it in your point Universe mathematical expressions.
BTW: I do not deny the quantize structure of Universe, I deny only dualities, probabilities and spontaneous creation
If you assume for approximation purposes that, the earth is a homogeneous sphere. Now if you draw time compression curves as a series of concentric circles from the surface closely bunched together near the surface and gradually with greater annular space as you go up and place the light source on the different curves. Since the light source is moving thru space and this movement is highly complex, since earth spins about its axis, the earth around the sun, the sun in turn around the galaxies center, and maybe he galaxy also sins around its central axis. What may be true for a freq measurement at one instant in time ( date ,hour, year) may be different from other. Furthermore this will be true for earth, yet different for other planets and stars in the galaxy.
originally posted by: ErosA433
a reply to: Nochzwei
Just appears to me that time dilation effects that are already known would be in effect and you can calculate it as is already known.
The universes clock as measured in terms of frequency shift, I am not sure what would be different to the older GR determination of the experiment.
I suspect lifting by 1 meter would not give any kind of frequency shift that is measurable beyond the systematics of the experiment. The other thing here is that there are lasers around the world that are tuned to hyperfine splittings, allowing them to be used to selectively ionize an isotope of interest, where it can then be collected.
These are some of the most accurately frequency tuned lasers that exist, or at least a very good benchmark... I don't think that height differences between the different sites that perform this, is really a factor in the tuning... as i suspect any effect is extremely small, if there is an effect at all.
any explanation of why the accepted, and mind baffling concept of duality of wave and particle needs to be overthrown?
i need it bc microchips have prooven certain quantum effects to exist. did you know your smartphone wouldnt work without the considerance of tunneled electrons?