It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sputniksteve
originally posted by: begoodbees
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: begoodbees
So the everything but the past 40 years is ancient history to you huh?
Don't be obtuse. You know ... or you SHOULD know ... that the more advanced medicine and psychology is, the more information it gets. We know more now then we did 50 years ago .. 100 years ago .. 200 years ago. To say that medicine and biology understanding is better 40 years ago than it is now ... that's absurd.
Something cannot be normal and a variation.
Yes it can. Green eyes are normal. Being left handed is normal. Being homosexual is normal. It's all within expected 'normal variation' range for humans. There is no one standard 'normal' human.
What I know is that "science" has morphed into a religion based on speculations and distortions of the facts. The more time passes the more corrupt and less reliable every institution becomes.
The only real science being done is in developing technologies and psychological methodologies in order to make everyone accept the indoctrination without resistance.
And religion is religion based on speculations, distortion of facts, and down right stupidity. Look where all of those feats of human evolution got us. Science, is just that. Thinking like you and the other yahoo in the beginning of the thread is the type that get people harmed for not acting a certain way, or thinking a certain way. Maybe you won't personally harm someone but it happens all over the world all the time because of old fashioned, uneducated, and ignorant world views and...religion.
Science used to argue the opposite of what you are now so against it arguing. Are you angry that the agenda is no longer in your corner, or did you also see it as propoganda when scientists were anti-gay?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: sensibleSenseless
I am a heterosexual woman, and I have been the recipient of numerous unwanted advances by heterosexual males. Some of those experiences have been very unpleasant. So should I assume that all heterosexual males are vile, unpleasant oafs who can't take no for an answer? Heterosexual males aren't okay, because I have had some bad experiences with them!
Seriously!
I've been shoved into closets, had office doors locked, threatened with firing. And that's only in the work area.
To add: my hubby was working an AIDS thing. He went in the gay bar, sat down at the bar to wait for his gay friend. Every guy at the bar got up and left. Hubby felt very sad, it hurt his feelings LOL
Oh no no, I am not speaking of therapy. I am speaking of deprogramming. Brainwashing. It can be done to add or take away just about anything from a personality.
.. you mentioned this - "A bigot can be programmed to be tolerant.". Phew, that's a tough one. It can take a lot of work and they have to want to change. There is self help therapy for those who recognize their problem and who want to change. Cognitive behavioral therapy.
originally posted by: begoodbees
Modern science is a religion based on speculations and distortions of the truth and is used as always to control and manipulate people.
Nope. Its not my way. When you admit you dont like a group of people solely based on who they are, that is bigotry. YOU said it. Not me.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
I never said you were an idiot. I said you missed the point. And you did.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
a reply to: MALBOSIA
I love it when people totally miss the point and peove themself a fool in the process.
Makes me smile.
I do give you credit though....you are one of the few who will actually admit to being a bigot.
Thank you for proving my point. I couldn't have planned it better. Didn't see it your way... guess I'm an idiot.
On top of that, you admitted to being a bigot.
So what exactly did I say that wasnt 100% accurate?
Oh right, people like you expect to be able to spew hate and not having anyone say anything about it. My bad. I forgot how you people work.
Your right. You called me a fool. And now you are calling me a bigot...
Its your way or the highway. I get it.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: begoodbees
The only ones bringing religion into these threads are the poor souls who follow a demonic version of Christianity. They are blindly spreading hate against groups of people they do not understand and refuse to listen to any arguments that counter what they have been told by someone at a sermon.
Jesus was about spreading love and acceptance, NOT hate.
Science is based on facts, observation, and the scientific method. Religion is based on faith.
Looking now. Dont see an issue. I dont hate anyone.
originally posted by: begoodbees
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
a reply to: smithjustinb
We get it. Youre a bigot.
Why are you still talking in circles, making yourself look foolish?
big·ot
noun \ˈbi-gət\
: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group)
Look in the mirror my friend.
Disliking an entire sect of the community because you dont like who they are is bigotry.
originally posted by: begoodbees
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
when a person admits to having a prejudice against gay people based solely on the fact that they are gay, is it really name calling to point out the bigotry?
originally posted by: whyamIhere
a reply to: captaintyinknots
I do give you credit though....you are one of the few who will actually admit to being a bigot.
You are very good at arguing your point.
Then you start name calling the first time somebody disagrees...Why ?
You are obviously intelligent enough to make your point without name calling.
Why is it that people think its their right to spread hatred, but not to be called on it? Dont like being called a bigot? Dont be a bigot, and certainly dont run around bragging about being a bigot.
Disliking certain behaviors is much different than disliking certain people.
You sure about that?
He never said he doesn't like gays. here is the real definition of bigot.
I don't like homosexual life partners.
originally posted by: sputniksteve
a reply to: begoodbees
They have saved my life twice, seriously. Twice I would have died if not for a seat belt.
I gotta say, while your posts are entertaining if not heart breaking, it is obvious that you are incapable of critical thinking and any further argument with you is a total waste of time. I hope to god that the public education system does something for your children in terms of teaching them how to think for themselves.
I wish you the best of luck.
All of my thoughts and opinions are my own based on my education life experience and intuition. The same cannot be said for most of those attempting to belittle me.
originally posted by: begoodbees
At birth they are alike.
A variation is a variation from what? The norm of course.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: begoodbees
Modern science is a religion based on speculations and distortions of the truth and is used as always to control and manipulate people.
Science is a Religion, huh?!?!?!?
Do we even need to debate about what a stupid statement that is, yet again????
So according to you Religion is Stupid and Science is a Religion too. So everything is all just a big lie and false teachings, yet you for some reason hold the one real truth I suppose. So are you the next messiah now who holds the truth for mankind???
originally posted by: begoodbees
Evolution cannot be proven by the scientific method and therefore it is not real science.
Turing was prosecuted for homosexuality in 1952, when such acts were still criminalised in the UK. He accepted treatment with estrogen injections (chemical castration) as an alternative to prison. Turing died in 1954, 16 days before his 42nd birthday, from cyanide poisoning. An inquest determined his death a suicide; his mother and some others believed it was accidental. On 10 September 2009, following an Internet campaign, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown made an official public apology on behalf of the British government for "the appalling way he was treated." The Queen granted him a posthumous pardon on 24 December 2013.
One influential tea party group called Texas Eagle Forum had urged the party to support psychological treatments that seek to turn gay people straight. It comes after Republican New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie last fall signed a law banning such therapies on minors, and California has a similar law.
“There’s a very, very small group of people who want to keep the party in the past. We were here today to try to pull the party into the future,” said Rudy Oeftering, vice president of the gay conservative group Metroplex Republicans. “The only way the party can go into the future is to start listening to young people, to start listening to people who have gay family members.”
Under the new plank, the Texas GOP recognizes “the legitimacy and efficacy of counseling, which offers reparative therapy and treatment for those patients seeking healing and wholeness from their homosexual lifestyle.”
Gay conservatives did come away with a rare victory at the convention: Winning the removal of decades-old language in the state party platform that states, “homosexuality tears at the fabric of society.”
One influential tea party group called Texas Eagle Forum had urged the party to support psychological treatments that seek to turn gay people straight. It comes after Republican New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie last fall signed a law banning such therapies on minors, and California has a similar law.
The Fort Worth Convention Hall cheered when party leaders announced that Christie finished a distant 11th in a 2016 presidential straw poll.