posted on Jun, 6 2014 @ 08:21 AM
originally posted by: MarlinGrace
There always has to be that contentious ignorant ape in the crowd with the pompous attitude that can't just say hey I think you made a mistake. The
skulls of which you speak do they include the one tested by Marcel Vogel the scientist with 27 years at IBM? The ones with the strange frequency and
no marks visible under microscope just a perfect smooth surface.
Not to sound pompous..but every time somebody tosses the word 'frequency' into a discussion like this, I feel compelled to ask "Frequency of what,
exactly?".
As for the 'no marks visible under a microscope', you do realize that, by definition, you just described every microscope and telescope lens or
mirror crafted since the late 1700's? It's hardly proof of alien origin, or even of cutting-edge technology...just proof of good craftsmanship and
careful technique.
To pull this back onto the original topic of forged golden artifacts, almost anything can be forged, given enough time, effort, and money. The more
valuable or significant an 'artifact' is, the more scrutiny it will attract, and thus, the higher the bar for proof of authenticity. The question
isn't whether a forgery is possible (see previous statement above), but whether the reward for pulling off said forgery is greater than the effort
required.