It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You didn't quote any science, what you said was this:
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
I didn't quote anything from WIKI... are you sure you are replying to the correct post?
I'm talking about science and about facts... I'm also talking from Experience...
Here's a paper about response to insulin which only attributes 25% of insulin response to adiposity, which I guess you could say adiposity is related to excess sugar intake, but I wouldn't say 25% correlation to adiposity infers "it's all about...sugar".
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
It's all to do with massive overload and sustained intake of sugar.
Basically what happens is your body becomes apathetic to sugar, in effect your body becomes resistant to insulin.
For example if someone was fat due to excess fat intake and didn't eat much sugar, then it would still be true that their insulin response is related to adiposity but it might have little correlation with sugar intake.
Values of insulin-mediated glucose disposal vary continuously throughout a population of apparently healthy persons, and a difference of ≥600% exists between the most insulin-sensitive and the most insulin-resistant persons. Approximately 50% of this variability can be attributed to differences in adiposity (25%) and fitness (25%), with the remaining 50% likely of genetic origin.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
You didn't quote any science, what you said was this:
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
I didn't quote anything from WIKI... are you sure you are replying to the correct post?
I'm talking about science and about facts... I'm also talking from Experience...
Here's a paper about response to insulin which only attributes 25% of insulin response to adiposity, which I guess you could say adiposity is related to excess sugar intake, but I wouldn't say 25% correlation to adiposity infers "it's all about...sugar".
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
It's all to do with massive overload and sustained intake of sugar.
Basically what happens is your body becomes apathetic to sugar, in effect your body becomes resistant to insulin.
The metabolic syndrome: is this diagnosis necessary?
For example if someone was fat due to excess fat intake and didn't eat much sugar, then it would still be true that their insulin response is related to adiposity but it might have little correlation with sugar intake.
Values of insulin-mediated glucose disposal vary continuously throughout a population of apparently healthy persons, and a difference of ≥600% exists between the most insulin-sensitive and the most insulin-resistant persons. Approximately 50% of this variability can be attributed to differences in adiposity (25%) and fitness (25%), with the remaining 50% likely of genetic origin.
Even if it is 25% correlated to sugar intake, if it's 75% due to other factors, those need to be considered, such as activity level/exercise. I was a pudgy kid until I started walking back and forth to school and that activity level made a huge difference in my adiposity.
There'[s not much we can do about the genetic influence though.
originally posted by: luciddream
Fat (and sugar) is bad for you because we consume excessive amount!!!
Imagine a hunter in the caveman era.... how often does he comes across meat whenever he can eat and sugar whenever he demand it or added to everything he ate?
we are saturated in excessive amount of calorie and we do not have enough activities to release those calories. instead we eat a big fat meal(big portions in a single sitting) with high amount of fat and sugar then we sit on the couch and drink beer(triglyceride, also fat).