It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“That is an amazing story to be told … that hasn’t been told,” Vick said.
The main body of the rocket impacted 45 km downrange from the launch pad. British intelligence detected the launch attempt, but the CIA's technical means for some reason missed it and they denied for years that it had ever occurred. Source www.astronautix.com...
Upon impact of the base of the N1 with the pad, the vehicle exploded with the force of a small nuclear bomb, destroying launch complex 110R. US weather and meteorological satellites revealed the disaster to the US intelligence agencies, and word soon spread through the government. Source www.astronautix.com...
Vick said. He’s also on the hunt for Defense Meteorological Satellite Program imagery from July 3, 1969, that purportedly caught the flash from an N-1 booster exploding, annihilating the rocket and launch tower. Source m.space.com...
“That is an amazing story to be told … that hasn’t been told,” Vick said.
www.astronautix.com...
Following the success of Apollo 8, Ustinov calls a crisis meeting at the Ministry of Defence. His question - how to reply to the American's success?
Ustinov points out that the Americans obviously had a better moon landing programme than the Soviets, as well as better management skills. He estimated there were 1.5 million Americans working on the Apollo programme, as opposed to only 500,000 Soviet citizens working on the Russian counterpart programmes. The American programme was under firm state control by a single Agency (NASA) as opposed to the Communist system, based on comradely co-operation between many entities. What then shall we do? asked Ustinov. It was suggested that he order Pilyugin to give priority to development of the N1-L3 guidance system. Currently the guidance for Yangel and Nadiradze ICBM's had priority in his bureau. Pilyugin himself suggested abandonment of the single-launch profile for the two launch variant for the N1-L3. This would mean it would take 4 to 5 years to land a Russian on the moon rather than 3 to 4 years. Who will care anyway? said Pilyugin. The Americans will have been there already.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
“That is an amazing story to be told … that hasn’t been told,” Vick said.
I am going to place my bets on that Charles Vick knows what he is talking about since he is a recognized expert in the subject matter of this thread.
++ Thanks to OBM for providing some examples of what weather satellite images looked like in 1969. Obviously these examples are not taken from Keyhole or DMSP because those are still classified.
With the successful return of Apollo 8 from lunar orbit at the end of December, the race to put a man around the moon was won by the United States. Further manned L1 flights were cancelled as pointless.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
I am going to place my bets on that Charles Vick knows what he is talking about since he is a recognized expert in the subject matter of this thread.
originally posted by: DelMarvel
That being the case, every quote from Vick found at the link you provided supports everything everyone else has said here about the Russian space program and the N-1 so it would seem to me this thread is logically concluded.
"where VIck argues that the USSR were indeed trying to design a 2 stage design where a mission was assembled in orbit. In the end they seemed unable to make up their minds which approach to use"
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
To quote just bit of OBM here and I agree with his assessment when he says
"where VIck argues that the USSR were indeed trying to design a 2 stage design where a mission was assembled in orbit. In the end they seemed unable to make up their minds which approach to use"
That is Ustinov talking, from the diary, or whatever, written by a researcher, in the badly footnoted article available on astronautix.
Did the Russians have a dual track lunar program as suggested by astronautix?
Did Frank Borman visit or observe the Baikonur secret complex?
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
originally posted by: DelMarvel
That being the case, every quote from Vick found at the link you provided supports everything everyone else has said here about the Russian space program and the N-1 so it would seem to me this thread is logically concluded.
What we have seen in this thread is that the history of N-1 is not as concrete as some people here are willing to believe it is. Especially in light of the facts. That Borman was in Russia for the second N-1 launch explosion in early July 1969, that newspapers indicated that his airplane flew near the secret launch area en route from Yalta to Novosibirsk.
Did Frank Borman visit or observe the Baikonur secret complex?
"If there were any plans to take him there, I am sure they were quickly shelved "
This newsclip further establishes my contention that Frank Borman, Apollo 8 commander, was invited to the top secret Russian launch facilities at Baikonur.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: Rob48
Where are the US satellite images from July 1968 that confirm the devastation at the Baikonur launch facility? It took the Russians months to rebuild the site... where are the satellite images that show these rebuilding efforts?
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
If you're going to complain about poor referencing skills you might want to start linking to your source for newspaper articles so that we can all read the entire piece in context, or at least screenshot the whoile thing.
originally posted by: Rob48
Lots of juicy documents for you here: www.globalsecurity.org...
Michel Desmaruet still has photos of the based on the dark side of moon.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SayonaraJupiter
It's also possible you're delusional.