It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Daedalus
a reply to: RationalDespair
no worries, i MIGHT be mistaken on that....i need to recheck the materials(could take a while, because there's a lot)....OR if constantine sees this, and searches it, we'll get our answer sooner...
originally posted by: 3mperorConstantinE
a reply to: aivlas
Unless EMT's are known to undertake (completely undocumented) CPR+electrocardiographic attempts at resuscitation on a patient with rigor-mortis after having died of FOUR gunshot holes to their face … then I would be forced to ‘guess’ that they were put on:
before
?
Glad I'm not the only one who is contemplating the implications of that oddity.
originally posted by: westcoast
It is totally normal to apply the pads to confirm that there isn't a heartbeat. This then is a matter of record (it is all recorded) rather than just someone voicing an opinion. The fact that one of the pads was on a ARM would indicate that they had no intention of actually shocking them. (improper placement)
originally posted by: NickDC202
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: NickDC202
*snip*
Update:
Here is a letter from Dawn Hochsprung to the SH parents detailing the new security protocol for 2012:
Wait....that's dated the same date as the shootings? So, they posted new security measures the same day??? Interesting coincidence.
No, the Hartford Courant published the letter (which was posted to the SHES website in the FAQ section) on the day of the shootings. The letter was sent to the parents at the start of the 2012-13 school year.