Special and General Relativity Should Not Be Considered Valid

Einstein expanded on Johannes Kepler and Newton. Though his was completely a thought hypothesis, with no experimental backing whatsoever and is the reason, he went horribly wrong with GR
a reply to: IAmTheRumble

originally posted by: Nochzwei
Einstein expanded on Johannes Kepler and Newton. Though his was completely a thought hypothesis, with no experimental backing whatsoever and is the reason, he went horribly wrong with GR
a reply to: IAmTheRumble

"no experimental backing whatsoever"

Yes pity you've never read of one single experiment conducted ever, that tested or confirmed Einstein's relativity. They've had over a century to test it, wouldn't you think they would have done so by now?

originally posted by: Arbitrageur

originally posted by: Nochzwei
Einstein expanded on Johannes Kepler and Newton. Though his was completely a thought hypothesis, with no experimental backing whatsoever and is the reason, he went horribly wrong with GR
a reply to: IAmTheRumble

"no experimental backing whatsoever"

Yes pity you've never read of one single experiment conducted ever, that tested or confirmed Einstein's relativity. They've had over a century to test it, wouldn't you think they would have done so by now?

Every single one of the results of these so called experiments and observations were interpreted to suit gr. dunno why, probably the Vatican wants it that way