It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Theres no question what he meant. Hes been talking about it all weekend.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
Theres no question what he meant. Hes been talking about it all weekend.
He is either clarifying his position .. or he's trying to talk over what he really said.
The rest was blah blah blah off topic personal insult and not worthy of remarking upon.
He is either clarifying his position .. or he's trying to talk over what he really said.
Its quite clear. To claim that this is anything OTHER than his saying you cannot have a person who discriminates against blacks in a predominantly black league is lying on your part.
“We cannot have an owner discriminating against a league that––we’re a black league, Ernie. We are a black league. - See more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...
"black thang". Look at people like Oprah. She has turn on the whole "black thang" every once in a while with her ebonics "yo go sista" or "you go girl". Even the President and his wife have to turn on their blackness with a few fist bumps here and there.
But NBA has been infiltrated by black culture i.e. thuggish gangster ghetto attitudes
originally posted by: jhn7537
I feel like you almost want it to be a racist comment by the way you keep arguing your side.
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
What bothers me the most, is that some of you wont just come out and own what you are really saying. Instead you dance around, avoid true conversation, deflect, and turn it into a sniping match.
And really, if you thought the way you feel about it was right, you would have no issue coming out and saying it.
Might be time for a long look in the mirror.
originally posted by: captaintyinknots
To claim that this is anything OTHER than his saying you cannot have a person who discriminates against blacks in a predominantly black league is lying on your part.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: jhn7537
I feel like you almost want it to be a racist comment by the way you keep arguing your side.
I feel like you see only what you want to see.
For the third time .... I was asked what this was and here it is.
Donald Sterling - private conversation in which his very bigoted views came shining forth. They happened when provoked by a girl friend who was rubbing her conquests with black men in his face. She's now being sued for allegedly stealing 2 million from his family.
Charles Barkley - public statement that probably meant to say that black people are predominant in the sport BUT instead he used the words that sound very much like he's dismissing the 23% non-black players as well as the non-black owners and workers.
TMZ reported that the exgirlfriend had been intimate with the men and the wife said the woman was a gold digger, so therefore the word 'conquests' was used. I'm allowed to use it.
Bets are only required for games. This is real life.
This is not about pride.
Pushing for someone to have a job because of their skin is an effect of racism
Your whole post reeks of ignorance.
It is a continuance of racism.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: olaru12
So asking if someones remarks are racist ... that makes the person asking the question racist? So when someone comes out and says 'it's a white league, it's a white league' or a mayor comes out and says 'my town is a vanilla town', or when a singer wears anti-black bling ... no one should say anything about those because that means they themselves are racist and the person displaying the questionable language or items really doesn't mean anything by it. Yeah, okay .. got it.
originally posted by: JohnPhoenix
I remember when Mayor Ray Nagin said New Orleans was a "chocolate city". He got blasted for that big time. But he said it in public and on purpose for all to hear like Charles did. Charles is wrong for his statements.
The Clippers owner's conversation should be ignored by all including the players because it was recorded without consent and was intended to be private. Whatever is said in that conversation is no bodies business.
How do you know this? According to everything I am hearing, he knew he was being recorded.
because it was recorded without consent and was intended to be private. Whatever is said in that conversation is no bodies business.
originally posted by: GreenMtnBoys
America is becoming "No Country For Middle Class White Males". LOL.
What's more ... our sources say Stiviano routinely recorded her conversations with Sterling as HIS "archivist." And what's more ... she would regularly play the tapes back to him because he would often forget what he had said.
Our sources say sometime after the tape was recorded on April 9 ... Stiviano and Sterling got in an argument because he wanted her to sign a confidentiality agreement ... which she would not. We're told he then denied ever making the racist statements on the tape, so she played the entire tape for back him ... before it was ever posted on TMZ Sports.
Read more: www.tmz.com...