It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: rickynews
Seems nice, but it's from Fox News... any other source?
It'd be cool, though, S&F.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: rickynews
Short of mounting antimatter missiles on an orbital weapons platform we couldn't defend against any large fast moving incoming asteroid. And antimatter devices are still only theoretical, it would take more energy than we produce globally to make in any sufficient quantities. Then there's the matter of storage and transportation.
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
I don't think it's a coincidence that we haven't had a big hit in years. The way our solar system is designed seems to prevent such events. Luck or perfectly designed? No one can answer that.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: swanne
Ground based lasers and particle beam weapons are also possibilities. Same problem with those as we have with antimatter devices, that being they are fiction.
Solar sails could work but how do you deploy them there when you may only receive a few days warning, maybe even hours?
originally posted by: swanne
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
I don't think it's a coincidence that we haven't had a big hit in years. The way our solar system is designed seems to prevent such events. Luck or perfectly designed? No one can answer that.
Tell that to the dinosaurs.
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
How many years ago was that again?
their still isn't 100% conclusive evidence that was the case.