Are Recent Cover Ups Intentionally Sloppy?

A lot of people (especially on here) have the belief that there have been a lot of false flags (9/11, Auroa, Sandy Hook, etc...) in order to move us closer to a police state. What if this wasn't accurate? What if it was more complex than that? What if these events were not to done to create a transition into a police state, but to do the opposite: create rebellion.

Perhaps these false flag events, were intentionally done sloppily to create (and increase) mistrust of the government. Perhaps the perpetrators left obvious clues that these events were coverups, conspiracies, false flags, etc...So the public began to question everything the government did, so the public begins to feel threatened, so public eventually gets tired of it, and decides to stand and fight. Then we start rebelling and tearing the country apart.

Now, if I were another country or an entity (Illuminati or whoever) that were trying to bring down our country or trying to move toward one government (or whatever my agenda was), I would know that it would be very difficult to bring down the U.S. externally. I know that their citizens would never allow a complete power grab either. So what would I do? I'd plant the seeds internally and then let the U.S. rip itself apart. Then when it's torn apart, come in as the savior, and eventually establish my agenda. How do you plant these seeds? First, infiltrate governmental offices, then start creating events that leave clues that the government had a hand in it, pass legislation that leads the American people to believe they are moving toward a police state, divide the country: racially, by gender, religiously, politically, etc...then wait for it all to blow up (the Bundy Ranch episode got close to lighting the first sparks).

I'm not saying I know anything, or have some inside information, I just started thinking why are all these events with obvious government corruption happening. Why are they being so sloppy? Then it clicked....maybe its on purpose. What makes this strategy absolutely perfect, is that there would be nothing we could do about it. Either let us grow in to an actual police state, or to rebell. It's win,win for them. I'm not claiming that my theory is complete, it's just a thought I wanted to share....

Hi...

It's interesting, I have not been on this site in forever, but just decided to jump on today and give it a quick perusal. I always enjoy going to the "new" section to see what people are just now talking about, and I saw your post. It was interesting to me because I wrote a bit of a diatribe quite some time ago on the "purposefully sloppy" happenings by TPTB, and so I thought I'd share it with you and this thread (assuming it's still accessible).

Peace...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by stdscf12


The problem I see is that you are thinking in singularity and not taking into account that there are many agendas at work at the same time. Take the war machine, arms dealers etc. No matter what happens, they will take advantage the situation to advance its own agenda. For instance, remember the live world-wide broadcasting of the marshal law searches following the Boston bombing and demos of militarized police equipment and vehicles and behaviour that sent chills down the most hardened spine? That image of someone upstairs in his house being ordered by loudspeaker in an armoured vehicle to shut his window just refuses to leave my memory.

reply to post by stdscf12


Yea, it seems like you had just discovered what has been the US foreign policy since...forever.
That's the definition of the western democracy.