It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Despite knowing that buying life experiences will make them happier than buying material items, shoppers might continue to spend money on the latter because they mistakenly believe items are a better value, according to a San Francisco State University study published today. That belief, however, isn't accurate.
"People actually do know, and accurately predict, that life experiences will make them happier," said SF State Associate Professor of Psychology Ryan Howell, a co-author of the study who has extensively researched the link between spending and happiness. "What they really underestimate is how much monetary value they will get out of a life experience. Even though they're told experiences will make them happier and they know experiences will make them happier, they still perceive material items as being a better value."
Part of the reason, Howell suggests, is that material items are a tangible reminder of what the item is worth. Life experiences produce only memories, which can be harder to put a price tag on.
"We naturally associate economic value with stuff. I bought this car, it's worth $8,000," he said. "We have a hard time estimating the economic value we would place on our memories."
Cabin
Found this interesting study in phys.org:
Despite knowing that buying life experiences will make them happier than buying material items, shoppers might continue to spend money on the latter because they mistakenly believe items are a better value, according to a San Francisco State University study published today. That belief, however, isn't accurate.
"People actually do know, and accurately predict, that life experiences will make them happier," said SF State Associate Professor of Psychology Ryan Howell, a co-author of the study who has extensively researched the link between spending and happiness. "What they really underestimate is how much monetary value they will get out of a life experience. Even though they're told experiences will make them happier and they know experiences will make them happier, they still perceive material items as being a better value."
Part of the reason, Howell suggests, is that material items are a tangible reminder of what the item is worth. Life experiences produce only memories, which can be harder to put a price tag on.
"We naturally associate economic value with stuff. I bought this car, it's worth $8,000," he said. "We have a hard time estimating the economic value we would place on our memories."
Read full article at: medicalxpress.com...
Interesting study, I personally do fully agree with the results. Experiences are something that is highly undervalued in the society. Going travelling, going to some seminar, just attending some event (concert, sports, whatever), anything like that, at the end creates emotions far more powerful than any material item can ever give.
Even if I got a Ferrari or something, the emotion would fade away quite fast. On the other, the emotions from different experiences can also be worth significantly more than material items. Every experience gives you something more and all these add up in the long run, boosting oneself as a person. The inspiration lead to significantly higher productivity as well as meeting the new people from different cultures, seeing the different places around the world - all that gives an advantage over other employees. At the same time, being "happier" leads to being generally more motivated, less under stress, healthier, which also translates into financial benefits.
Happyness generally is something that I believe should be taken far more seriously at any company. The ones who understand that salary by itself is only part of the "formula", who understand that the additional costs spent on employees, creating a workplace where people want to work at, the productivity boost gotten from all it, outweighs any costs made on making such things happen, are the winners at the end. Just looking at people as number, as costs, might be cost-effective in short-term, but will be detrimental to any company in the long run, especially in the 21st century.edit on 2-4-2014 by Cabin because: (no reason given)
ketsuko
reply to post by 3shadesofblack
I was just thinking that books are a balance. I can and do read my books over and over. Each time is another intangible experience of that great story. I would far rather spend money on a book than almost any other material object.
ketsuko
reply to post by AccessDenied
Yes, my husband definitely cringes when he hears me say, "So, I went to the book store ..."