Source: any thing or place from which something comes, arises, or is obtained
Influence: the capacity or power of persons or things to be a compelling force on or produce effects on the actions, behavior, opinions,
etc.
Education: the act or process of imparting or acquiring general knowledge, developing the powers of reasoning and judgment, and generally of
preparing oneself or others intellectually for mature life.
Fact: a truth known by actual experience or observation; something known to be true. Something said to be true or supposed to have happened.
So what your saying is, I will just have to trust you?
Our education that we receive is deemed to be of the highest standards based on fact. Says who?
For a moment, think about it. Is that a fact? Prove it.
A fact as stated above, is a truth known by actual experience or observation or something 'known' to be true. Says who? Where do we get our facts of
life from? Education.
Education 'teaches' us what its all about. Its a panel of people that decide and
Influence what we read in our text books and what we are
'allowed' to learn in our schools. I don't know for certain that Jesus existed, I have been told by our
sources he did, I have never met the
source, but apparently, according to my education, they are a reliable one. Facts that are told through the bible and other sources. But I wasn't
there. I wasn't there for the moon landing, I wasn't there when the wall came down at Berlin in 89, I wasn't a cowboy or an 'Indian' (Native
American), nor was I among those that discovered America. So as far as I am concerned, up until the day of my birth, and upon reaching an age of being
able to remember what has happened in my life, its all just been one big, long, story...
A story that is very enthralling at times and of great interest to me. Now please, do not get me wrong. I am not trying to suggest that these things
are not true, I am merely attempting to breach the wall of the source of reliability. Who am I to argue with them, I wasn't there, but I am, like
everyone else, relying on the books and the statements of the 'trusted' peoples facts.
In the end, it comes down to a stamp of approval. If it has a stamp of approval, its legit, no questions asked, it has the all powerful, stamp of
approval. (Whispered) question it not.......
What if someone, that has no 'stamp' has a fact for you? Because it does not have a stamp, does this mean that it did not happen, or it does not
exist? A question of fact is a question concerning the reality of an alleged event or circumstance in a trial by jury, usually determined by the jury.
We are the jury when it comes down to certain facts. Did anyone witness what I did several years ago in the Wolds of Yorkshire in the UK? No, do many
people believe me??? Does that mean it did not happen? Can you see where I am going with this?
I present many 'facts' from what I would consider a reliable source, this reliability may differ from the person I am talking to about the 'facts';
"Where did you hear that?"
"Says who?"
"Why isn't it on the news?"
Oh, I see, your looking for that 'Stamp' from a government that we all trust? That we know do not tell us lies at all? That don't false-flag, or
undermine, or ridicule at all, ever... hmmm-kay.
If we want to hone in to one of the main sources of the deliberate 'dis-information' that is circulating in our every day life, then you can bet it's
influence is increased in the schools. In-fact, if the 'awakened' way of thinking could start in the schools, the sooner we can battle this ruddy out
right EVIL.
What we learn in a class room or a text book, is what we carry with us in our life. Its our deliberate 'given' knowledge that we cannot necessarily
choose to believe or not. Apart from our own unique experiences, we are engineered to fit those facts into our own lives. The moon landing, I had been
convinced that it had not happened to be honest, my opinion changed, the more I did my own research into the subject and found other very valuable
sourced information that I did change my own mind about the subject. So we can change our minds. But its not a case of debunking 'moon landings' or
sightings, its about whats is going on behind the scenes that people are so oblivious to. Its dangerous how subjugated we are and how ridiculous we
think anyone is for 'daring' to say otherwise.
We go with what we have been told we know. To listen to the people that we 'trust', those people with the stamp of approval. Please just remember the
next time somebody gives you a 'fact', and you ask where the source is from. By all means, investigate the source, make up your own mind about the
source, we aren't mindless idiots, we are intelligent, decipher the BS for yourself, you never know, the next time somebody mentions UFO's and
Illuminati control of the media and the reach of its influential governing body, this could well be a ruddy fact, the research has been done, the
people were where they were when they said they were.
These are the testimonies of ex government ranked officers and rates, scientists and R&D department heads, people that have worked at this facility,
or that facility, or was there when they said they were. And you get the, "wow look at this AMAZING information... Where is it from?" Oh, it hasn't
come from a well known media source or an 'official' (make-me-laugh) statement that everyone was privy to? Then it cant be a fact... can it?
A lie will always be a lie, even if everybody believes it, and the truth is still the truth even if nobody believes it...
edit on 28-3-2014 by
D0M1N0 because: Changed to - the in the 9th paragraph
edit on 28-3-2014 by D0M1N0 because: (no reason given)
edit on
28-3-2014 by D0M1N0 because: removed a repeated word.