Obama: I'm Concerned About a Nuke Being Detonated in Manhattan

reply to post by tigertatzen


I am not saying that I think because he said it that it will now happen, only that it would no longer surprise me if it did happen. I too question everything, as the more I learn in these days, the more that I see that this world we are living in is nothing more than a veil for something that none of yet have the words to even begin to explain. As you said, SOMETHING is causing ripples or manipulating the world around us, which is why I believe that even the random moment is willed by the "big picture", even if not consciously, some form of thought from within some type of mind caused it to happen, even if for no real reason. The patterns are the occurrences that had reason behind them, although sometimes even the one time happenings have a strong outcome. I believe that we can not truly begin to use the proper words to touch upon it just yet. It may even transcend "language" and can only be explained through form or symbols.

Look up Sollog. He's been saying for years there's going to be a nuke detonated in New York city. He was mocked on this very site for saying what Obama said yesterday. Also he has predicted stuff like the 911 attacks. He predicted those three years to the day before they happened. Yet he was mocked here for that warning also.

He predicted a leader would get a bullet in the head two weeks before Gabrielle Giffords was shot in the head. Mocked again by the geniuses on this website.

blupblup
reply to post by BrianFlanders

 

Yet it was linked in the very first post of this thread...so....um....yeah.

I was referring to the fact that the thread got created in the first place, the OP may or may not have been aware of the other thread but considering the fact that they didn't just go post in the other thread, it's a safe bet they didn't. At any rate, the point was that this site is massive and you can't expect everyone who ever makes a thread to be aware of every thread in existence before they post one. Even searching for it often is literally a chore. The search function on this site is atrocious. I don't even like using it unless I have to.

He predicted a leader would get a bullet in the head two weeks before Gabrielle Giffords was shot in the head. Mocked again by the geniuses on this website.

I could make the same prediction and find a match within two weeks, most likely. The term "leader" is pretty broad, especially in the above example.

Gazrok

He predicted a leader would get a bullet in the head two weeks before Gabrielle Giffords was shot in the head. Mocked again by the geniuses on this website.

I could make the same prediction and find a match within two weeks, most likely. The term "leader" is pretty broad, especially in the above example.

Great. Go ahead and make the prediction then, if you dare, to test your theory.

AngryCymraeg

simsumre

markosity1973
reply to post by simsumre

 

I am of course referring to the many and varied anti government groups in your country that departments like homeland security were created to monitor.

If you have ever read nostradamus, you will understand that ww3 is not a conventional war with huge armies fighting on a given battlefield. The enemies live within and there are multiple attacks made all over the place aka terrorism. This is what Obama alludes to. As unpopular a he is, he's not completely stupid.

The United States wouldn't exist if there were not "anti-Government" groups. The entire revolting against the King of the largest Empire in the world doesn't happen without that.

Americans do not kiss Government ass. Our Government was created FOR and BY the people. They are public servants, not masters.

I didn't know that you revolted against the Chinese Empire. Please do a bit of basic fact checking. Oh and it's 'Martial Law', not 'Marshall Law'. One is military rule and the other is a comic book character.

At the time of the American Revolution, China didn't have a king.

false flag alert.

They are floating that heinous idea to the sheeple now.

Predictive programming.