It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Europe
Probe identifies suspects over Lockerbie bomb
Al Jazeera uncovers evidence Iran's secret service and a Palestinian group were behind bombing of Pan Am flight 103.
Last updated: 11 Mar 2014 13:54
Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker
Email Article
Print Article
Share article
Send Feedback
Twenty-five years after the Lockerbie bombing, Al Jazeera has uncovered evidence which casts doubt over the entire investigation and trial into what was the biggest case of mass murder ever seen in Scotland.
Documents obtained by the network, and verified by security and legal experts, point to the involvement of Iran's secret service, Hezbollah and the armed group The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) - General Command.
Libya admits Lockerbie blame
Libya has handed over a letter to a United Nations Security Council meeting formally taking responsibility for the Lockerbie bombing in 1988.
news.bbc.co.uk...
Danbones
reply to post by R_Clark
remember the 5 dancing palistinians at 911?
Kukri
Danbones
reply to post by R_Clark
remember the 5 dancing palistinians at 911?
I thought they were Israelis?
According to the United States Government, the crew incorrectly identified the Iranian Airbus A300 as an attacking F-14 Tomcat fighter
Kukri
Danbones
reply to post by R_Clark
remember the 5 dancing palistinians at 911?
I thought they were Israelis?
Danbones
Kukri
Danbones
reply to post by R_Clark
remember the 5 dancing palistinians at 911?
I thought they were Israelis?
ooops
sarkasm to make point /off
sorry
eta
hmmm, thats a good point Bellor...i would not have thought of that
did anyone go to jail for shooting down that iranian plane or put sanctions on the US i wonder...
or god forbid...invade the us with alCIA duh, kill the president, and take all the gold...
and piss DU in the best water on the continent?
edit on Wedpm3b20143America/Chicago26 by Danbones because: (no reason given)edit on Wedpm3b20143America/Chicago01 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
R_Clark
reply to post by Danbones
No... but there was something fishy about all those Saudi guys getting on the flight... and now the suppressed report that shows Saudi complicity in the event..
Who carried out this complicated plot? David Leppard’s “security sources” knew the answer to that as well. “Iran
paid the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command, a hard-line Palestinian terrorist group, up to 10 million dollars in advance to carry out a revenge attack for the shooting down of an Iranian airbus by an American warship in the Gulf in July 1988.”
...
In the weeks before the bombing, a Palestinian terrorist gang acting under the orders of the PFLP-GC were engaged
in making bombs and fitting them to Toshiba recorders with the intention of planting them on an American aircraft. Indeed, the German police, in an operation they called “Autumn Leaves”, had actually arrested members of the PFLP-GC gang.
...
One final fling at the PFLP-GC and their connections before the bombing with Malta was made on Granada Television in November in the run-up to the second anniversary of the disaster. The programme focused on a bakery in Malta and a Palestinian cell based there. The programme made the same connection as the Sunday Times had done a year earlier – between the fact that the clothes in the bomb suitcase were bought in Malta and the less certain fact that an unaccompanied bag from Malta was loaded onto a Pan Am feeder flight from Frankfurt to London and thence to Pan Am 103. To illustrate this hypothesis, the programme showed a sinister-looking Arab checking in a bag at Malta airport and then sliding surreptitiously away while the plane took off.
This was too much for Air Malta, who sued Granada for libel. Norton Rose, the London commercial solicitors, compiled a huge dossier detailing almost everything about the flight from Malta to Frankfurt on the day of the Lockerbie bombing and proving that all 55 bags checked in on the flight could be ascribed to passengers, none of whom travelled on to London. The evidence was so powerful that Granada settled the action before it got to court. They paid Air Malta £15,000 damages and all the costs of the case.
The judges conceded that the difference between Gauci’s original description of the man as six feet tall
and 50 years of age and Megrahi’s actual height and age (five feet eight inches, 37 years of age) was “a substantial
discrepancy” (68). But Gauci’s identification was, they concluded, “entirely reliable”.
In what must have been a novel interpretation of Scottish law, they went further. “There are situations,” they said, “where a careful witness who will not commit himself beyond saying that there is a close resemblance can be regarded as more reliable and convincing in his identification than a witness who maintains that his identification is 100 per cent certain”