BREAKING: Bitcoin creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, uncovered; did classified work for U.S. military and ma

Far from leading to a Tokyo-based whiz kid using the name "Satoshi Nakamoto" as a cipher or pseudonym (a story repeated by everyone from Bitcoin's rabid fans to The New Yorker), the trail followed by Newsweek led to a 64-year-old Japanese-American man whose name really is Satoshi Nakamoto. He is someone with a penchant for collecting model trains and a career shrouded in secrecy, having done classified work for major corporations and the U.S. military.


A new worldwide currency, secret dealings with corporations and the U.S. military, Suicide?
This is something that needs to be dug into.

reply to post by devildogUSMC


Source? Just because he did classified work for US agencies doesn't prove he created Bitcoin even if his name is Satoshi Nakamoto, I doubt he'd use his real name.

Clearly this man is not the bitcoin creator. If I call myself John Smith does that mean I am your neighbor who is also John Smith?

devildogUSMC
Far from leading to a Tokyo-based whiz kid using the name "Satoshi Nakamoto" as a cipher or pseudonym (a story repeated by everyone from Bitcoin's rabid fans to The New Yorker), the trail followed by Newsweek led to a 64-year-old Japanese-American man whose name really is Satoshi Nakamoto. He is someone with a penchant for collecting model trains and a career shrouded in secrecy, having done classified work for major corporations and the U.S. military.


A new worldwide currency, secret dealings with corporations and the U.S. military, Suicide?
This is something that needs to be dug into.

edit on 6-3-2014 by devildogUSMC because: (no reason given)

edit on 6-3-2014 by devildogUSMC because: (no reason given)

I know you beat me to this post by meer minutes, but I do have actual information on the topic and subject.

ATS Post and Source

reply to post by StallionDuck


Well let's just keep it here. Please share any info you have here.

reply to post by devildogUSMC


I'll mention what I said in the other thread. Our posts are based on different topics. I just happen to have a source that you're requiring in your post. We just share one thing... the identity of the man in question. As it stands, your post is incomplete.

I might also add, the information you have in your post is from a snippet of a sight that takes a snippet from another site (Newsweek) that you need a subscription to read the article.

reply to post by StallionDuck


Okay, duck.