It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In this video series the currently accepted theories of physics and astrophysics are shaken to the core by a radical new theory of the fundamental forces in all matter. You will be amazed as a magnetic model of the dome at CERN is used to create a 100 mm diameter plasma Sun with a 300 mm diameter equatorial disc of plasma around it! All the plasma videos are actual footage with no enhancement or manipulation other than speed. In other words, this is real thing. Hard to believe, but it is all true.
To summarize:
KrzYma
for those who want more information about electric/magnetic Universe, here a series of videos with a theory, that in my eyes could eliminate unanswered questions.
Mary Rose
Or is electric current really magnetic current, as Leedskalnin said?
The Nature of Current
Written by David Thomson
Modern physics has many errors. The primary reason for these errors is the incomplete understanding of the nature of charges. In the APM, there are two distinct, quantifiable types of charges; the electrostatic charge, and the magnetic charge. Due to the misunderstanding in mainstream physics, the nature of current is not properly understood.
The electrostatic charge is exactly as the name implies, it is static. When a balloon or other spherical surface accumulates electrons or positive ions, it builds up electrostatic charge. Electrostatic charge is appropriately represented by the plus (+) and minus (-) signs.
Charge is not some kind of separate existing point particle. It is a property of nature similar to the properties of length, time, and mass. Electrons may possess the property of charge, but the property of charge is not only associated with the electron. In addition, the electron has two distinctly different types of charges; one of which is called magnetic charge.
The magnetic charge relates to the electrostatic charge, but they operate independently. Magnetic (also called electromagnetic and strong) charge is the carrier of the strong force, whereas electrostatic charge is the carrier of the electrostatic force. When static charge builds up, it is because electrons (or other charged particles) are accumulating at a single location and building potential. When the potential releases, the moving electrons then flow according to their magnetic charge. It is because of the magnetic charge of electrons that flowing electrons (current) produces magnetic fields.
The concept of electrons moving due to their magnetic polarities is not new. Ed Leedskalnin first wrote about this mechanics in 1945. When current flows through a wire, it is the magnetic charge of the electrons that provides the force. As the electrons accumulate in some place in the circuit, such as in the dielectric of a capacitor, the electrostatic charge builds potential.
The Hall effect, electromagnetic radiation, current, resistance, and nearly every unit involving the dimension of charge actually operates due to the magnetic force between particles (not the electrostatic force). Only one unit, the unit of magnetic moment, involves both magnetic charge and electrostatic charge. It is because of the tug between the electrostatic charge and the magnetic charge within a subatomic particle that the particle wobbles and creates its magnetic moment.
A proper understanding of electricity requires the understanding of the two distinct and quantifiable types of charges. Only by understanding the relationship of magnetic currents and electrostatic buildup in circuits will we truly understand how electricity works.
www.16pi2.com...
So when they say “plasma” they mean these spicules, right? If this is the case then there doesn’t appear to be enough heat observed to create the coronal temperatures. Perhaps they are on the right track though.
The spicules are accelerated upward into the solar corona in fountain-like jets at speeds of approximately 31 to 62 miles per second (50 to 100 kilometers per second). The research team says that the majority of the plasma is heated to temperatures between 0.02 and 0.1 million Kelvin, while a small fraction is heated to temperatures above one million Kelvin.
This is a model that they made up. I had the same question that you had.
To answer this question, Klimchuk and colleagues constructed a theoretical model of the nanoflares, which are components of the loops of hot gas that arch high above the solar surface to make up the corona.
Where’s the relevance here? Are these the observed “spicules” or something made up to explain the observed hot temperatures?
That thread refers to a "model" and I'm not 100% sure if what that model called nanoflares are the same thing as what the actual observations refer to as "spicules"
”Can have”, as in it might be possible?
These loops are made up of bundles of smaller, individual magnetic tubes or strands that can have temperatures reaching several million degrees K,
This appears to be an ad hoc explanations to me.
nanoflares are so small that they cannot be resolved individually
This electric scaring of the Grand Canyon theory has been around for a while. I think I originally read it on the old Thunderbolts site some years ago. I do not think it is Dr Scotts theory but apparently he briefly brushes over it in his book; The Electric Sky.
It's definitely Don Scott, though I'm not sure who else. Here is Don Scott trying to defend criticism he received for mentioning the electric grand canyon in his book:
He goes on to compare Valles Marineris to the Grand Canyon in size only. I cannot find any mention of the Grand Canyon possibly being formed by an electric discharge in his book. Maybe I missed it though. Even so he gives credit to Thornhill.
Thornhill and other like-minded investigators also theorize that the electric discharge machining produced a monstrous scar across the face of Mars…
A team of researchers from Johannesburg recently discovered that a single lightning bolt could, for example, blow three to 10 cubic metres (100 to 350 cubic feet) out of bedrock.
I trust you mean this thread and the information you provided there.
I'm disappointed you failed to appreciate all that stuff I took the time to explain,
But if you still don't like the analogy read the better source which I already provided.
Mary Rose
reply to post by Unity_99
What I want is a unified theory that is aether/ether-based.
I think the aether is the only way to pull it all together.
originally posted by: Mary Rose
reply to post by Unity_99
What I want is a unified theory that is aether/ether-based.
I think the aether is the only way to pull it all together.
originally posted by: Godthief
originally posted by: Mary Rose
reply to post by Unity_99
What I want is a unified theory that is aether/ether-based.
I think the aether is the only way to pull it all together.
The electric universe is governed by the laws of abraham and allows man free will and the ability to create as god on earth. The magnetic universe is the earth and allows for a number of things. They were separated to breed creation if left together they ability is greatly hindered
edit on 26-9-2016 by Godthief because: Mistake