It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, I was observing the electron beam curve in the magnetic field, as in the photo. If everybody left the room and there was no longer anybody observing it, do you really think it would stop doing exactly what it was doing when I was observing it? It's not a double slit experiment, y'know.
It has been suggested that consciousness plays an important role in quantum mechanics as it is necessary for the collapse of wave function during the measurement. Furthermore, this idea has spawned a symmetrical proposal: a possibility that quantum mechanics explains the emergence of consciousness in the brain. Here we formulated several predictions that follow from this hypothetical relationship and that can be empirically tested. Some of the experimental results that are already available suggest falsification of the first hypothesis. Thus, the suggested link between human consciousness and collapse of wave function does not seem viable. We discuss the constraints implied by the existing evidence on the role that the human observer may play for quantum mechanics and the role that quantum mechanics may play in the observer's consciousness.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
When it's turned on It is emitting a Certain Frequency and Vibration that Curves the Energy you're Observing and Likely the Curvature happens because you're observing it .
. Again... like others on this thread, you don't appear to understand the things you are arguing against.
a possibility that quantum mechanics explains the emergence of consciousness in the brain.
Anyway it sounds like you've made up your mind to believe what seems to me to be a religious type of viewpoint, and I've learned it's useless to argue with people about their about religious beliefs, so I'll just leave you with this link you probably won't read since you've already made up your mind:
“The Answers Have Changed Albert Einstein was once giving an exam paper to his graduating class. It turned out that it was the exact same exam paper he had given them the previous year. His teaching assistant, alarmed at what he saw and thinking it to be the result of the professor’s absentmindedness, alerted Einstein. “Excuse me, sir,” said the shy assistant, not quite sure how to tell the great man about his blunder. “Yes?” said Einstein. “Um, eh, it’s about the test you just handed out.” Einstein waited patiently. “I’m not sure if you realize it, but this is the same test you gave out last year. In fact, it’s identical.” Einstein paused to think for a moment, then said, “Yes, it is the same test but the answers have changed.” Just as the answers in physics change as new discoveries are made, so too do the answers in business and in marketing.”
a reply to: asabuvsobelow What year did Einstein allegedly say that? I know something of the history of physics and I know Einstein taught in 1909, 1910, 1911, and 1912. If those are the 4 years he taught, that would narrow down the year he said that to either 1910, 1911, or 1912. I can't imagine how that much could have changed in one year from the previous year in any of those three years in the subjects Einstein was teaching. So unless you can provide a reliable source, and the source cites exactly when he said it, I think there's a strong likelihood it's a fictitious quote.
Many modern theories predict that the fundamental constants depend on time, position or the local density of matter. Here we develop a spectroscopic method for pulsed beams of cold molecules, and use it to measure the frequencies of microwave transitions in CH with accuracy down to 3 Hz. By comparing these frequencies with those measured from sources of CH in the Milky Way, we test the hypothesis that fundamental constants may differ between the high- and low-density environments of the Earth and the interstellar medium.