It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Boogie
Close Encounters: tonal language, and 12 member team (how many in CE were standing there before Dryfus got picked?)
Originally posted by Hal9000
several notations from Linda Howe
Originally posted by Obscure
Apparently, this Richard Doty person was part of a counter-intelligence group in the 80's. He was assigned to shadow Linda Howe and figure out whatever she knew, mislead her, etc, etc. He openly admitted that last night.
11 November
Time pieces would work but would record Earth time. If you had your PC there it would work fine if you could supply it with the correct voltage/amperage and 60 cycles. However, the PC would run on an Earth clock and record Earth time not the time on SERPO, you'd have to update your software to get it to run on a SERPO clock which is 38 hours not 43. As for how energy is extracted from the vacuum they use what is called a Crystal Rectangle, see book:
www.amazon.com/gp/product/0976642603/002-3958207-8622461
Finally, as for the laws of Physics, an AF Col just emailed us last night and said what's been said all along. The Laws of Physics on SERPO are no different than they are on Eart, see above... Anon has been stating nonsense when it comes to physical laws........
Originally posted by dgtempe
i'm just a girl, here, please be nice to me.
I heard it all on the Coast to Coast show, and at first, for the first time, i BELEIVED it all! Then i thought, what if this is just a dissinformation tactic by this govenment to make us THINK about this, and if some form of war starts they could blame it on these EBO's? oR SOME like form out there?
I'm so confused! I havent ever beleived in any of this, but that show was very convincing..Anyone else listen to it?
I havent read all the posts.
Doty said he was at first skeptical of the Project Serpo information, but later heard rumors within the intelligence community that the story is in fact true.
Don't mean to sound so negative but I cannot help feeling that this seems all a little bit "John Titor" .
I'm so confused! I havent ever beleived in any of this, but that show was very convincing..Anyone else listen to it?
Section 3.4 of EO 12958
The staff of the National Security Council is de jure an element of the Executive Office of the President, but de facto is a central element of the White House staff itself. President Eisenhower created a new position to head that staff: the assistant to the President for national security affairs; every President since has continued that office and strengthened the staff. The twenty senior-most NSC officers have presidential titles and rank; the total staff now numbers nearly two hundred, many of them detailees from State, Defense, and CIA. American Presidency.org
"Project SERPO's" final report was written in 1980 Comments to Posting 5
(1) reveal the identity of a confidential human source, or reveal information about the application of an intelligence source or method, or reveal the identity of a human intelligence source when the unauthorized disclosure of that source would clearly and demonstrably damage the national security interests of the United States;
(2) reveal information that would assist in the development or use of weapons of mass destruction;
(3) reveal information that would impair U.S. cryptologic systems or activities;
(4) reveal information that would impair the application of state of the art technology within a U.S. weapon system;
(5) reveal actual U.S. military war plans that remain in effect;
(6) reveal information that would seriously and demonstrably impair relations between the United States and a foreign government, or seriously and demonstrably undermine ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States;
(7) reveal information that would clearly and demonstrably impair the current ability of United States Government officials to protect the President, Vice President, and other officials for whom protection services, in the interest of national security, are authorized;
(8) reveal information that would seriously and demonstrably impair current national security emergency preparedness plans; or
(9) violate a statute, treaty, or international agreement.
Sec. 3.1. Definitions. For purposes of this order: (a) "Declassification" means the authorized change in the status of information from classified information to unclassified information.
(b) "Automatic declassification" means the declassification of information based solely upon:
(1) the occurrence of a specific date or event as determined by the original classification authority; or
(2) the expiration of a maximum time frame for duration of classification established under this order.
(c) "Declassification authority" means:
(1) the official who authorized the original classification, if that official is still serving in the same position;
(2) the originator's current successor in function;
(3) a supervisory official of either; or
(4) officials delegated declassification authority in writing by the agency head or the senior agency official.
Sec. 1.5. Classification Categories.
Information may not be considered for classification unless it concerns:
(a) military plans, weapons systems, or operations;
(b) foreign government information;
(c) intelligence activities (including special activities), intelligence sources or methods, or cryptology;
(d) foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources;
(e) scientific, technological, or economic matters relating to the national security;
(f) United States Government programs for safeguarding nuclear materials or facilities; or
(g) vulnerabilities or capabilities of systems, installations, projects or plans relating to the national security.
Originally posted by Centrist
Don't mean to sound so negative but I cannot help feeling that this seems all a little bit "John Titor" .
That hasn't been an uncommon comment in this thread. Care to elaborate? One of the things about this "story" that bothers me so much is that it's not easily disproven and every time I turn another corner, I find something that makes the truth of this story more likely, rather than less likely.
But I'd be interested to hear how this story sounds "John Titor". I never know which rock someone's gut feeling will point me to or what I'll find when I turn it over
Originally posted by Towards Omega
Where were the original threads posted, on what message board?