It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Boeing says the Nov. 13 decision by the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers (IAM) to reject a long term contract extension deal gives it “no choice” but to look at alternate sites away from the Seattle, Wash., area to assemble the 777X and its composite wing.
The ‘no’ vote is a setback for the company which expects to officially launch the 777X at the Dubai air show early next week. Boeing had hoped to cement a deal in advance of the program go-ahead, and the contract rejection adds a new level of complication and uncertainty to the planning process for the re-engined, re-winged 777 derivative.
Although the vote was substantially against the deal by a margin of 67% to 33%, the IAM is expected to seek further talks with Boeing over a compromise deal as part of further efforts to retain the work in the Puget Sound area. However, the rejection of the deal, which would have extended the IAM contract from 2016 to 2024, means that any revised contract must now compete with financial packages designed to lure production of Boeing’s largest ever twinjet to alternate sites.
Zaphod58
reply to post by Sammamishman
I would personally love to see them move it and knock the unions down a peg or two.
Zaphod58
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Unions are a joke and are worse than corporations when it comes to greed and power hunger. They can all rot and I wouldn't lose any sleep.
Boeing CEO Jim McNerney's compensation rose 15 percent last year to $21.1 million, as the company rewarded him for better-than-expected profits and faster airplane production.
Chicago-based Boeing Co. posted a 2012 profit of $3.9 billion, down 3 percent from 2011. Revenue rose 19 percent to $81.7 billion. Growth in its commercial airplanes business has been offsetting shrinking demand for its military wares.
Zaphod58
reply to post by liejunkie01
Why do you guys love to put words in my mouth. Show me once when I've said ANYTHING LIKE YOU CLAIM. ONE TIME
Oh yes, unions are perfect organizations that only have the workers best interest at heart and would never do anything wrong right?edit on 11/14/2013 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)
liejunkie01
Seriously Zaph, with no unions, pay dramatically decreases, for everyone. Have you even tried to find a job in todays market?
Every job that I went to apply at were non union , every single one, except one, starts everyone out at $10-$14 an hour. The exception being $18 an hour and most with no benefits.
It's alright for a company to make billions and Ceo's to make tens of millions, but when the employee, that makes the product, wants nothing more than a decent living, is belittled and shamed?
I feel people like you are out of touch with the real market today. Skilled labor deserves more than $14 an hour.
Sorry but beliefs like yours is driving this country under because unions are becoming rarer and people cant make it on minimum wage.
Zaphod58
reply to post by liejunkie01
Why do you guys love to put words in my mouth. Show me once when I've said ANYTHING LIKE YOU CLAIM. ONE TIME
I would personally love to see them move it and knock the unions down a peg or two.
buster2010
Yes like every organization there is corruption but if there were no unions there would be no middle class.
Zaphod58
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Unions are a joke and are worse than corporations when it comes to greed and power hunger. They can all rot and I wouldn't lose any sleep.