It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
35Foxtrot
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
A bit off-topic... But, what is it with some of you guys and spelling Earth as "EA*RTH?" WTF is that all about. I tried a search but no joy.
I've seen it a few times but only on ATS. What's up with that?
35Foxtrot
The issue I see is why would you post these drones in set areas like you say when it seems it would make more sense to locate the dangerous objects FIRST through observation - something we have some difficulty doing now - and then send a drone or whatever to intercept. Seems more cost-effective that way, no?
1 spells EA*RTH the way it is in respects to LORD ENKI or EA who cam here from the STARS*
They could be scattered thorough out the SOL system 35Foxtrot all the way out to Pluto... With cams and other observation techs and can monitor incoming threats far out. This is why they would have to be drones to allow FASTER advanced engines that may harm a living human inside them.
35Foxtrot
Yeah. That was kinda my point. One drone -or a couple- parked near Earth or on Earth(any object posing a danger to Earth will have Earth as an endpoint. Thus, Earth would be a decent starting point for any object/vessel heading out to stop said dangerous object) would be MUCH more cost-effective than parking a butt-load of them all over the solar system - many along paths that would undoubtedly place them outside of any possible intercept course.edit on 10/11/13 by 35Foxtrot because: (no reason given)
Ophiuchus 13
35Foxtrot
Yeah. That was kinda my point. One drone -or a couple- parked near Earth or on Earth(any object posing a danger to Earth will have Earth as an endpoint. Thus, Earth would be a decent starting point for any object/vessel heading out to stop said dangerous object) would be MUCH more cost-effective than parking a butt-load of them all over the solar system - many along paths that would undoubtedly place them outside of any possible intercept course.edit on 10/11/13 by 35Foxtrot because: (no reason given)
Near EA*RTH can potentially cause FALLOUT process... Hence catch them far out which allows debris path TIME to move out of the way of EA*RTHs path. Close to EA*RTH or based from or near EA*RTH space does not allow time especially of larger target in question...
Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by 35Foxtrot
Fusion explosion from laser far out would knock them out of path of EA*RTH would it not? If that doesn't work use rail defense. Far out don't want the fusion process to interact with anything near EA*RTH...
Your points make sense, still a circular like laser array within another within another making three spinning lasers in one aimed @ the asteroid/comet cause fusion explosion seems like it could change the movement and material strength then send rail component to finish depleted debris chunks left. To add an advance sonic device could then deteriorate the remaining pieces into dust...
cost not considered hence global effort for free...edit on 11/10/13 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)