It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
bozzchem
Source
Apparently one can take the law into their own hands as long as it is done to protect LEOs.
This man had no due process, no trial, no voice, no chance to speak. His wife was Judge Dredd and apparently that's OK since she supposedly saved the lives of our oh so precious LEOs.
If she doesn't face trial for murder, the precedent being set here is substantial.
FlapdoodleStork
reply to post by opethPA
You're assuming that her story is true. There needs to be more to back up her story.
Smells like a set-up to me.
Court documents suggest Gary Roberts was in a tailspin prior to his death. He had become erratic, unstable, dangerous and suicidal.
included in the collection were .50 caliber machine guns. A Youtube video shows you the size and power of the weapon. The army uses them to stop vehicles and shoot through brick walls.
bozzchem
This seemed the most appropriate forum to me but I could be wrong. Move it as needed.
Source
Apparently one can take the law into their own hands as long as it is done to protect LEOs.
This man had no due process, no trial, no voice, no chance to speak. His wife was Judge Dredd and apparently that's OK since she supposedly saved the lives of our oh so precious LEOs.
If she doesn't face trial for murder, the precedent being set here is substantial.
edit on 5-10-2013 by bozzchem because: (no reason given)
bozzchem
This seemed the most appropriate forum to me but I could be wrong. Move it as needed.
Source
Apparently one can take the law into their own hands as long as it is done to protect LEOs.
This man had no due process, no trial, no voice, no chance to speak. His wife was Judge Dredd and apparently that's OK since she supposedly saved the lives of our oh so precious LEOs.
If she doesn't face trial for murder, the precedent being set here is substantial.
edit on 5-10-2013 by bozzchem because: (no reason given)
FlapdoodleStork
reply to post by opethPA
And I'm pretty comfortable with my assumption, considering the details from this story in USA Today.
Indiana man told his wife to shoot him, documents say
A marriage on the rocks, a domestic dispute, and an opportunity to capitalize on the police's paranoia about armed citizens.
The right thing for her to do would have been to leave the home, and to warn police of the situation.
Then Mr. Roberts may have been given a chance to surrender and tell his side of the story.