It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MystikMushroom
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
That's why I didn't touch ANYTHING when I peered down there. I was sure that 90% of what I was seeing was nothing more than undercover LEO's laying traps. I just couldn't believe that the FBI and others weren't staging stings to catch people. I mean, come on ... there's no way you can hire a hit man over the internet and it be legit.
I felt like I needed a real, physical shower after looking at the deep net.
MysticPearl
MystikMushroom
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
That's why I didn't touch ANYTHING when I peered down there. I was sure that 90% of what I was seeing was nothing more than undercover LEO's laying traps. I just couldn't believe that the FBI and others weren't staging stings to catch people. I mean, come on ... there's no way you can hire a hit man over the internet and it be legit.
I felt like I needed a real, physical shower after looking at the deep net.
I'm generally surprised so many on ATS are happy about law enforcement wasting resources on something like SilkRoad when multiple alphabet agencies are involved in bringing the drugs into this country in the first place.
oxford
reply to post by AlliumIslelily
Your surprised there aren't more replies....have you noticed that in the forum generally lately? I was wondering if they were doing MITMA and users are being segregated into separate forums.
Weird how the internet has gone so quiet all of a sudden.
alienreality
The silk road prices were way too high anyways, pardon the pun..
Looks like the Feds don't like anyone except themselves selling drugs..
AlliumIslelily
MysticPearl
MystikMushroom
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
That's why I didn't touch ANYTHING when I peered down there. I was sure that 90% of what I was seeing was nothing more than undercover LEO's laying traps. I just couldn't believe that the FBI and others weren't staging stings to catch people. I mean, come on ... there's no way you can hire a hit man over the internet and it be legit.
I felt like I needed a real, physical shower after looking at the deep net.
I'm generally surprised so many on ATS are happy about law enforcement wasting resources on something like SilkRoad when multiple alphabet agencies are involved in bringing the drugs into this country in the first place.
Any thoughts? I'm no lawyer, just rambling. Also, I'm surprised there aren't many posts in this thread. This is pretty huge!
hknudzkknexnt
reply to post by hknudzkknexnt
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by MystikMushroom
You express my own sentiment so well there. A shower. Yes. It's not a joke, is it? It's also impossible to explain why it's not a joke without physically showing someone or waiting for them to return for their own life learning experience. I think that's why I'm almost coy and evasive about questions on TOR and the levels below it.
I can't say there is NOTHING good down there because some corners make Wikileaks look like Barnes and Noble peddling mainstream policy. It's quite a world of crap to find just a few shiny turds tho, isn't it?
AlliumIslelily
So if this information is accurate, I think we can say Tor is not completely compromised. You are secure as long as you use it correctly, which has always been the case. This means journalists in censored countries who use Tor for protection should still be safe as long as they take the proper precautions and don't mess up. Sounds like this guy just got overconfident and slipped up on some of the basic areas of maintaining anonymity.
needlenight
reply to post by hknudzkknexnt
Well.. there goes TOR...
damn.. what else we got?
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by SadistNocturne
I hear ya about freedom and the need for it without Big Brother in our business and down our throats (Dr. Sammy now too, for that matter), still?
There is some real evil and criminal activity in what has generally existed as the Wild West of the Internet. Rules are necessary....
As a matter of fact, and when I think about it? A lot of people lately have quite literally been asking and wondering about life without Government at various levels of anarchy would be like. I'd point to the overall Onion world. That's what it looks like. Some of the best ...along side things that go into the real evil category. I kinda liked the idea of one place free, as well. Totally free. That has been interesting to explore too. It reeks of what's infested it though, as the best way I could put it.
So, it doesn't necessarily bother me to see law enforcement finally in that world. I wouldn't invite them...but I won't complain about the occasional beat cop, so to speak.
The real Wild West was romper room with Quakers by comparison. lol.....
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by SadistNocturne
First, the feeling is mutual on the civil debate despite differences on the topic. I'm not sure how far off we are though. I liken them to a beat cop now because a beat cop sees only a small % and then, can act on only some of that. They are in TOR. Okay. It's good to have that confirmed.....but what has really changed?
As you note, Silk Road was offering some things over any line of society and if they hadn't been, how much work would have been justifiable to bring them down? Seriously, this had a major downside for them too. This made TOR a household "Huh? What's that??" Where it had not necessarily been that before.
Nothing about tracking people down there has gotten any easier today than it was yesterday. It's still half a step from fantasy to achieve it for the sheer digital physics of how the whole thing operates. Having said that....it's now obvious that any slight mistake in what makes TOR effective, including user error, will make illegal (TRUE hardcore) illegal activity something that just isn't safe enough to do.
That's a good thing when it's a pretty short list of what the FBI would consider worth the sheer effort required to attack something down in the mist and ether. That's my opinion anyway. FBI Agents may be go getters and then, they may not be. FBI Managers are bean counting goobers ...and that works to our benefit more than not, I think.