It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why I Think Rebuilding The Temple of David Should be Endorsed ...

page: 6
4
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 1 2013 @ 03:51 PM
link   
reply to post by ntech
 

Zechariah 3 mentions that God would eventually bring forth his servant the Branch. Then Zechariah 4 describes the Branches plural.
Those are two different words in the Hebrew, not just the singular and the plural of the same word, even if they both get translated the same somehow.
The word used in chapter 4 could very well be describing bunches of the olive fruit itself.

Essentially the Branches are the Lord's personal assistants.
I think you are engaging in some reverse interpretation from Revelation's use of this imagery in its description of the two witnesses.

Between verse 12 and 13 there is an apparent gap of several thousand years.
Any special reason why you think that? Other than just more projecting your sense that something hasn't been fulfilled yet and that it somehow has to be, in a literal way.

And he calls him Lord.
That is a fairly common word used in the Old Testament and does not usually mean a god, or son of god.

Then that would make this guy the Son of Man. The other half of the Godhead.
I don't see how making an oath or whatever serves to identify the person.
edit on 1-9-2013 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)



 
4
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join