BUSTED! US, UK, back false-flag chemical attack in Syria

It has been published already 7 months ago. But most people forgot the leaked emails that have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

The article has been suppressed from dailymail.co.uk of course, however a copy can be found in the following link. As I cannot connect both links here to one link you have to go first to here

web.archive.org...

and than copy this link into it,
www.dailymail.co.uk...

reply to post by Brucee

Or you can just click here:

Source

Everyone needs to see this.

Yeah and the US had plans called project north woods to hijack planes crash them and blame the terror attacks on Castro so they could invade Cuba on false pretenses, Doesn't mean they did it...

ETA, the above is sarcasm...

reply to post by gladtobehere

U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'
•Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying 'the idea is approved by Washington'
•Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was 'totally unacceptable'By Louise Boyle
PUBLISHED: 14:16 EST, 29 January 2013 | UPDATED: 14:16 EST, 29 January 2013

This is from the article!!! FROM January 29th, 2013!!!

Oh boy.....What have you stumbled upon here?? This is not good!!!

Originally posted by benrl
Yeah and the US had plans called project north woods to hijack planes crash them and blame the terror attacks on Castro so they could invade Cuba on false pretenses, Doesn't mean they did it...

Doesn't mean they blamed Castro. They could have Blamed some one like Bin Laden instead, start the whole War on Terror, invade Afghanistan and Iraq, and the Industrial Military Complex CEO's walk away with Billions of profits from tax payer dollars.

Brilliant plan if you're an evil genius

loll all links are blocked

Yes, because despite knowing how many hacking attempts and cyberattacks there have been, they're going to put their big plan in an email accessible to the net, instead of say, picking up a phone, or having a face to face meeting, or hell, even using Skype. And they're not going to use innocent sounding words or even try to disguise what they're taking about. Makes perfect sense to me.

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Yes, because despite knowing how many hacking attempts and cyberattacks there have been, they're going to put their big plan in an email accessible to the net, instead of say, picking up a phone, or having a face to face meeting, or hell, even using Skype. And they're not going to use innocent sounding words or even try to disguise what they're taking about. Makes perfect sense to me.

Governments have done stupider things.

reply to post by benrl


Governments, not contractors. Governments generally don't face arrest and jail, contractors can and do. These people are not stupid. Don't mistake greed for stupidity.

In the event the Web Archive is scrubbed, here is a screen capture of the article.
DailyMail: U.S. backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime

Hi there.

That's... kinda... Freaky...

and quite compelling.

No wonder there has been a lot of stuff about Goverments hitting the press.

Maybe there are more planes.. ahem... plans in motion?

eee.

Brings me back to snow den. He took the Intel and ran with it a few months after Benghazi, leaked the video, wonder what else he found. Must have something good in his possession.


When was this plan formed?

I see it says January 29th. Benghazi was in September and Snowden abandoned ship and turned traitor sometime in January as well.

umm....coincidence maybe

So is this perhaps why Putin is saying hold off, I am not so certain it was Assad that really did this chemical attack?

www.theguardian.com...

The Daily Mail has apologised and paid £110,000 in libel damages to a London defence firm it wrongly linked with an alleged chemical weapons plot in Syria.

Britam Defence Limited complained that an article on the Daily Mail's website Mail Online falsely accused two of its executives of conspiring in a "nefarious and illegal plot" in the Middle Eastern state "for enormous financial reward".

The article quoted one email supposedly sent between two executives at the company which claimed to show that Britam had agreed to supply chemical weapons to Homs for use in an attack. However, the emails turned out to be forged

You mean the one they faked, and were taken to court for and fined over for faking emails?

reply to post by khimbar


Guess this is where the confusion and confliction begins.

Who's telling the truth?

Fake emails? But then they could have been true but deamed fake to cover the tracks.
But then the paper was sued? etc.

Its a head scratching moment.

But the coincedence of the subject is striking.



eee.

Originally posted by Brucee
It has been published already 7 months ago. But most people forgot the leaked emails that have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

The article has been suppressed from dailymail.co.uk of course, however a copy can be found in the following link. As I cannot connect both links here to one link you have to go first to here

web.archive.org...

and than copy this link into it,
www.dailymail.co.uk...

edit on 26-8-2013 by SkepticOverlord because: removed all-caps thread title

not sure how to evade the terms and rules

but ******* Edom

who rules the US and EU

and their disGUSting tricks into syria

May they Burn in Hell

all of Edom

Archive this info, share this info!

Here's more on how to access it:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Wayback archive -missing - www.abovetopsecret.com...

Also, Youtube search yields some videos sharing the screen shots.

Originally posted by khimbar
www.theguardian.com...

The Daily Mail has apologised and paid £110,000 in libel damages to a London defence firm it wrongly linked with an alleged chemical weapons plot in Syria.

Britam Defence Limited complained that an article on the Daily Mail's website Mail Online falsely accused two of its executives of conspiring in a "nefarious and illegal plot" in the Middle Eastern state "for enormous financial reward".

The article quoted one email supposedly sent between two executives at the company which claimed to show that Britam had agreed to supply chemical weapons to Homs for use in an attack. However, the emails turned out to be forged

You mean the one they faked, and were taken to court for and fined over for faking emails?

edit on 26-8-2013 by khimbar because: (no reason given)

Yeah, I don't know about that right there. It could very well have been an official leak, and just to cover their tracks, they bring in the best Attorneys, using the Billions of profit made by the Military Industrial Complex contractors, spend the big dough on the big lawyers, sue sue sue and make it go away.

I don't believe it was a forgery/faked.......the timing & the topic in January, compared to US gov now saying there are chemical weapons and they have to "Go In." ...Yeah something's not right here

It's taken down because it was faked.

They had to take it down.

www.theguardian.com...

Martin Wood, for Associated Newspapers, said in a statement before the judge, Mrs Justice Nicola Davies: "My lady, on behalf of the defendant, I confirm that the defendant offers its sincere apologies to the claimants for the damage and distress caused by the publication of these false allegations, which had appeared on US websites.

"The defendant acknowledges that the emails in question were completely fabricated and that there is no question of any of the claimants being involved – or even considering becoming involved – in the heinous actions to which the article referred. The defendant is pleased to set the record straight."

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
In the event the Web Archive is scrubbed, here is a screen capture of the article.
DailyMail: U.S. backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime

thanks for this.

i am not surprised to hear something like this, at the moment you have Russia, Syria, Iran & China blaming the rebels & the USA, UK, France blaming Syria Government, the truth is that we will never really know who did it.

my reasoning is that Assad knew what would happen if he used chems & it wasn't worth taking the risk of using them because it would cause more damage if he was found out.