It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While scientists are finding new ways to justify using chemtrails in our skies, a recent study shows that pollution trapped in thunderclouds is making climate change worse.
Kravtiz and Calderia, working with Douglas MacMartin from the California Institute of Technology, studied sky color ad brightness by utilizing a sulfate-based aerosols. They surmised that using these chemicals in the atmosphere would cause the daytime skies to be whiter and the sunsets to glow brighter.
Computer models showed that although the sky would remain blue, it would be a much lighter shade; especially over areas that experience more geoengineeing than others.
Scale at which Quantum Effects Dominate Properties of Materials
When particle sizes of solid matter in the visible scale are compared to what can be seen in a regular optical microscope, there is little difference in the properties of the particles. But when particles are created with dimensions of about 1–100 nanometers (where the particles can be “seen” only with powerful specialized microscopes), the materials’ properties change significantly from those at larger scales. This is the size scale where so-called quantum effects rule the behavior and properties of particles. Properties of materials are size-dependent in this scale range. Thus, when particle size is made to be nanoscale, properties such as melting point, fluorescence, electrical conductivity, magnetic permeability, and chemical reactivity change as a function of the size of the particle.
Nanoscale materials have far larger surface areas than similar masses of larger-scale materials. As surface area per mass of a material increases, a greater amount of the material can come into contact with surrounding materials, thus affecting reactivity.
In other words, a single cubic centimeter of cubic nanoparticles has a total surface area one-third larger than a football field!
• Nano-aluminum poses hazards not found with micron-sized aluminum powders
• Nano-aluminum is very sensitive to electrostatic discharge
• Dust clouds of nano-aluminum in air present an explosion hazard at even small concentrations of aluminum and small amounts of ignition energy
(Nanowerk News) Nanometre-sized bubbles containing the gases hydrogen and oxygen can apparently combust spontaneously, although nothing happens in larger bubbles.
Combustion only takes place in bubbles that are smaller than 150 nanometres; nothing happens in larger bubbles. Early experiments in microreactors also showed that nothing happened in larger bubbles; the heat can dissipate to the larger internal surface.
Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific timeline for the use of EnMod technologies in cooperation with the Weather Modification Association (WMA), a business-government group promoting the beneficial uses of environmental modification [20]:
2000 Introduce ionic mirrors, with a sharp increase from 2008;
2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as well as military) aviation;
2004 Create smart clouds thru nanotechnology, with exponential increase after 2010;
2005 Introduce ‘carbon black dust’.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
A geoengineering proposal, allegedly still on the table, would loft nano aluminum or barium or strontium or other substance (sulphur, salt water) into the atmosphere to alleviate global warming/ global cooling/ global change/ global disaster et.al.
A side effect of this activity is said to be white-out of the sky and more beautiful sunsets. The sky would be a paler blue and more reflective. Some have already noticed this effect.
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by luxordelphi
A geoengineering proposal, allegedly still on the table, would loft nano aluminum or barium or strontium or other substance (sulphur, salt water) into the atmosphere to alleviate global warming/ global cooling/ global change/ global disaster et.al.
A side effect of this activity is said to be white-out of the sky and more beautiful sunsets. The sky would be a paler blue and more reflective. Some have already noticed this effect.
Are you saying that even though all the articles point to this being a "proposed idea" , that it's already happened?
Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails
Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific timeline for the use of EnMod technologies in cooperation with the Weather Modification Association (WMA), a business-government group promoting the beneficial uses of environmental modification [20]:
2000 Introduce ionic mirrors, with a sharp increase from 2008;
2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as well as military) aviation;
2004 Create smart clouds thru nanotechnology, with exponential increase after 2010;
2005 Introduce ‘carbon black dust’.
• Nano-aluminum stored in a humid environment can experience an exothermic reactions
• Samples of less than 210g nano-aluminum did not build up enough heat to selfignite, even in a hot, humid environment
>300g quantities have demonstrated extreme exotherms
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
While I do appreciate your participation in my thread, I must refer you back to the title (indicative of the substance in this case), which is: 'Spontaneous Ignition in the Sky.'
To further explain the substance: nano particles, whether already lofted or still in the wings, can have startling behaviors while interacting, at large, within our environment.
I am proposing that a flaming sky could result.
Test was repeated with >300 sample and > 50°C exotherm was recorded
•
No self-ignition
This, as an accidental discovery, in a lab, is relatively benign. This sort of discovery, in the sky, after critical mass or whatever has been reached, could be much more complicated. Smart Clouds would have to be renamed after they start to flame up because they just wouldn't be all that smart anymore.
Seems kind of a contradictory thing to spend billions of tax payer dollars to fill the atmosphere with protective metal salts, and then throw Carbon Black dust into the experiment.
I would think that the "Scientists" are strictly using a theory of what "Should" happen and "Don't" know what Side Effects this could have on the planet be they good or bad.
Any attempt at global manipulation of any system or natural process which produces a dangerous or destructive result by failure? .....brings capital punishment upon those who planned executed it. ONLY global attempts now.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by sulaw
That and the fact that these particles are being created in a fast and furious manner for use in almost every aspect of our lives.
They are being released into the environment without anything but the most minimal knowledge of what can happen.