It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jhill76
That statement rings true. For example: From your viewpoint, you believe that angels are not real. Unto self, this is true, because you have not had any experiences or proof of their existence.
Now, since you believe that this is true, when a message is needed to be said to you from above, Father will not send one that appears as an angel. This reason is because you have made up in your mind, that they do not exist. For if he did, and said person said they are an angel, you will be so hung up on the angel aspect, you will discard the message that is given to you. The message is more important than the giver. Nor, does the giver, require any belief on your part, the giver is more worried about the message, that they are conveying.
Or, for example, you believe that man charts his own path. You are not faulted for this by above, because above understands why you think this way, unlike here, where you are faulted for believing a certain way. Many are best utilized because of the way their thought processes work.
Hitler for example, believed in total control of the world, to him he believed that was his purpose. When an event needs to occur, or a path needs to be followed, Father needs said person to believe in it wholeheartedly, not partially. Each one here has a purpose, rather good or bad, which is all perspective anyway, depending upon which viewpoint your are looking at it from.
Does Father require belief? No, because he will still continue to do what is needed, and he knows your thought processes, and he understands more than anyone here or above, why you do the things you do. Man is not here to understand why he does the things he does, but man is here to understand why man does the things he does. It is all a learning process for all. If one believes one way, let him, if another, another way, let him. Man is only allowed to see the outside, not the inside of a persons thought processes, that is too intrusive.
You never know, Father could have said person believe the way he does, for a purpose you are not privy to, nor have the understanding to understand.
Are you proposing that we do not need to "think" about our own beliefs and actions in accord to God's equation, expectation, and word?
I'm not someone who believes in anything "random", even if our minds have a tendency to perceive it that way.
I believe everything has a perfectly designed order (like nature).
I also believe we (as humans) have a tendency to throw wrenches into that wheel spoke of order, but we'll never be able to throw it completely off track.
Everything has a way of regenerating itself, even when we think we've damaged it.
So what gives you the experience to definitively say this entire universe is the product of a ruling divine entity?
I know you're not very old, but surely something of significance has happened in your life that made you think that someone higher than yourself might have intervened or protected you or provided for you when you didn't expect it? No? Nothing at all?
OK, there is a Wikipedia article on Relativist Fallacy.
Truth is not relative. In fact, there is a specific fallacy dealing with that very notion called the "Relativist Fallacy". Truth is independent of people knowing it or believing it. Case in point, the world was still round even when everyone believed it to be flat.
So, according to this description, the "fallacy" only applies within narrowly defined circumstances.
The fallacy applies only to objective facts, or what are alleged to be objective facts, rather than to facts about personal tastes or subjective experiences, and only to facts regarded in the same sense and at the same time.
ob·jec·tive (b-jktv)
adj.
1. Of or having to do with a material object.
2. Having actual existence or reality.
3.
a. Uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices: an objective critic. See Synonyms at fair1.
b. Based on observable phenomena; presented factually: an objective appraisal.
4. Medicine Indicating a symptom or condition perceived as a sign of disease by someone other than the person affected.
When an event needs to occur, or a path needs to be followed, Father needs said person to believe in it wholeheartedly, not partially.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by jhill76
When an event needs to occur, or a path needs to be followed, Father needs said person to believe in it wholeheartedly, not partially.
No, he doesn't. His will shall be accomplished wether you tow the line or go your own way. It has nothing to do with him needing you to believe in anything. One who has everything has no needs.
I don't know who your "Father" is but he is not the biblical one. He punished Israel several times for trusting and believing in lies from false prophets and soothsayers. This was spoken of in Jeremiah 7, and various other scriptures. Believing in something does not make it right or true. Millions of people in the U.S. alone believe it is right to kill unborn babies, that does not make it right. One man may believe it is right for him to steal money from another. Truth and righteousness are not subjective.
edit on 31-7-2013 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by the sloth
reply to post by jhill76
No. Just no. And shame on all the ATSers indulging this nonsense. OP, I think your heart is in the right place, but ultimately, you're doing everyone here a disservice. The klu klux klan BELIEVES that they're a superior race. Is that true? NAMBLA BELIEVES that sex with little boys is natural and acceptable. Is that true? Remember when we all believed that we were sending troops to Iraq to protect the U.S. from terrorism? Still believe that to be true? Lay off this everybody's right-hippie-bull crap. Reality is indisputable. Fantasy is subjective. If someone tells me they think they saw an angel the other day then I'm going to call their bluff. Ever notice the pattern with religious claims?: There's NEVER any hard evidence. Give me one good reason to tolerate something so silly save for sparing someone's precious feelings.edit on 31-7-2013 by the sloth because: ?
I don't know who your "Father" is but he is not the biblical one.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by jhill76
When an event needs to occur, or a path needs to be followed, Father needs said person to believe in it wholeheartedly, not partially.
No, he doesn't. His will shall be accomplished wether you tow the line or go your own way. It has nothing to do with him needing you to believe in anything. One who has everything has no needs.
I don't know who your "Father" is but he is not the biblical one. He punished Israel several times for trusting and believing in lies from false prophets and soothsayers. This was spoken of in Jeremiah 7, and various other scriptures. Believing in something does not make it right or true. Millions of people in the U.S. alone believe it is right to kill unborn babies, that does not make it right. One man may believe it is right for him to steal money from another. Truth and righteousness are not subjective.
edit on 31-7-2013 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)