It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by neobludragon
I think that is an over simplification of thier tone of voice. These are the voices of people who were compelled by thier patriotism, thier respect for self determination, and for the rights of citizens, to ask questions that they knew might, potentially, land them in a heap of trouble.
That they asked these questions anyway, that they wouldnt let it drop, despite thier concern, is testament to thier honour, and makes the act of asking them an even more significant, an even braver act.
Student B: General Alexander also lied in front of Congress.
NSA_F: I don’t know about that.
Student B: Probably because access to the Guardian is restricted on the NSA’s computers. I am sure they don’t encourage people like you to actually think about these things. Thank God for a man like Edward Snowden who your organization is now part of a manhunt trying to track down, trying to put him in a little hole somewhere for the rest of his life. Thank god they exist.
The thing that allowed the students to embarrass the recruiters so readily was that they had done their homework and had the facts at hand. If you build it up based on facts you can get away with little daggers like the one above...
source
NSA_F: I don’t believe the NSA is telling complete lies. And I do believe that you know, people can, you can read a lot of different things that are portrayed as fact and that doesn’t make them fact just because they’re in newspapers.
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
reply to post by eLPresidente
Interesting comment, from the female NSA employee, that no one seemed to pick up on.
source
NSA_F: I don’t believe the NSA is telling complete lies. And I do believe that you know, people can, you can read a lot of different things that are portrayed as fact and that doesn’t make them fact just because they’re in newspapers.
It does not mean it's true just because it's in the press.
Originally posted by starwarsisreal
reply to post by eLPresidente
While I applaud their actions how long will it takes before the students were branded as terrorists and have the swat team swarm into their homes.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
I find it extremely curious that the female rep tries to draw lines between fact and fiction yet she keep reiterating how she isn't in a position to answer or know all of these answers. She tries to keep a nice cushy barrier between her, the NSA, and having to answer questions (that she claims she doesn't know how to answer)...then goes on to draw doubt by attacking the press.
Clever!.....not...
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by bowaconstricta
The thing that allowed the students to embarrass the recruiters so readily was that they had done their homework and had the facts at hand. If you build it up based on facts you can get away with little daggers like the one above...
#1. The NSA Restricts things like the Guardian at times like this for the same reason the Army and Air Force did. It isn't from every device, but from those connected to scanned, secured and monitored Government networks. Should a Classified document pop-up on one of those systems where it shouldn't have been popping up FROM ...like an outside internet connection, for instance, it'll create 10 different forms of headache and could really make trouble for the guy who pulled it up ..100% and FULLY automated by computer scan and response for a good % of the first part of the whole mess. FAR easier to restrict the potential SOURCE ...than expect 10's of thousands of human beings to "not touch the hot stove" after being asked nicely.